[AfricaRealities] * Misleading, inaccurate and empty petition from Kagame’s consultants, research, journalists, workers and supporters criticises the BBC programme abut Rwandan genocide:

 

This is a petition that jeopardises the intellectual integrity of these so-called scholars. It is about protecting their consultancy jobs and money offered to them by Kagame despite some of them being paid by the institutions they are working for . Others are  freelancers who need  money to live on. Others are paying back for the past money  that they received from  Kagame. It is a shame on these scholars to  sign a such empty  petition.

---

From: "Samuel Desire sam4des@yahoo.com [Democracy_Human_Rights]" <Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr>
To: "Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr" <Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr>; "africarealities@yahoogroups.com" <africarealities@yahoogroups.com>; "rwandalibre@yahoogroups.com" <rwandalibre@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 14 October 2014, 20:33
Subject: Re: *DHR* Misleading and inaccurate petition from Kagame's consultants, research, journalists, workers and supporters criticises the BBC programme abut Rwandan genocide:

 

The war criminal and dictator Kagame has used his consultants to  deny his war crimes and crimes against humanity. The consultants have found themselves in an embarrassing situation when they were asked by Kagame to sign the petition below( prepared by Kagame). These  Kagame's consultants and workers could not refuse to sign the petition due to the consultancy jobs and bribes they were offered in the past and other consultancy opportunities they are expecting in the future.

 

It is also well known that  that BBC journalists who were reporting Kagame's war under his protection were frequently shown  the dead corpses of Hutus killed by the RPF as Tutsi corpses killed by the Interahamwe. These  tactics are well-known in guerrilla wars. This is why  the number of killed Tutsi still don't add up and the  higher and magic  figures of massacred Tutsi have become a mystery.

 

 

---

From: "Afrika Watch afrikawatch@yahoo.com [Democracy_Human_Rights]" <Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr>
To: Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr
Sent: Tuesday, 14 October 2014, 11:47
Subject: *DHR* Misleading petition from Kagame's consultants, research, journalists, workers and supporters criticises the BBC programme abut Rwandan genocide:

 

Misleading petition from Kagame's consultants, research, journalists, workers  and supporters criticises the BBC programme abut Rwandan genocide

 

Kagame is well known to be using bribes to attract support from  white people from USA and Britain.

 

A group of international consultants who have been working for Kagame for the last 20 years have now criticised the BBC programme in relation to Rwandan genocide.  The letter was prepared by Kagame and circulated  by the Rwandan Embassy in the UK for signature  by these consultants.

 

Among  people who have signed the petition below include representatives of NGOs who have using genocide cards to get British money to fund their NGOs. Andrew Walllis was  paid £150,000 by Kagame to  create his Open Democracy  website and write the book "Silent Accomplice: The untold Story of the Role of France in the Rwandan Genocide, I.B.Tauris, 2014". Even Romeo Dallaire who failed to prevent the genocide because of his lack of neutrality during the conflict in his role as representative of UN mission to Rwanda has signed the petition. Romeo Dallaire supported Kagame's war in order to remove the former regime of Habyarimana.

 

It is even strange to see that the content of the letter  is referring to  the investigations by Judge Marc Trévidic  to support the consultants' arguments while  the dictator and war criminal Kagame, Andrew Wallis and Linda Melvern have been documenting and accusing France of their involvement in the Rwandan genocide. It is well known that any different view to Kagame's version of the history of  Rwandan genocide is considered by  the war criminal and dictator Kagame as  genocide revisionism. BBC was right to ignore these investigations because they are not credible and have not yet provided any answer to who shot the plane that was carrying two Presidents and their crew and entourage. The French approach to this matter has been repentance rather than finding the truth. In addition to this, the  preliminary outcome of  French investigations do not conclude that the plane was not shot by Kagame. So, it was not necessary for BBC to refer to them while investigations have not yet been completed.

 

The content of the consultants' letter written to BBC is not credible because these consultants  have been  working for Kagame for many years, paid  to write books about  him and his war, to represent him abroad and in various international conferences, They received financial support from Kagame  to attend various conferences related to genocide.  These consultants have not provided contradictory  facts about the fake numbers of Tutsi killed as the result of the genocide. They have never condemned the massacres, war crimes and crimes against humanity  committed by Kagame in Rwanda and in DR Congo.

 

In this petition, no credible answer was provided by the consultants about the issues raised by BBC.

 

Will  we have people to defend  and support  Kagame's version of the history of Rwandan genocide even after his death. Let's wait and see !

 

"Rwanda's Untold Story," BBC Documentary Offers Compelling Case Of Kagame As War Criminal - See more at: http://www.blackstarnews.com/us-politics/justice/rwandas-untold-story-bbc-documentary-offers-compelling-case-of-kagame-as-war#sthash.RShmsXd3.dpuf

BBC Asks 'What Really Happened in Rwanda? History of the Genocide. Role of the US

 

http://www.globalresearch.ca/bbc-asks-what-really-happened-in-rwanda-history-of-the-genocide-role-of-the-us/5407758

 

Relate story

 

FULL LETTER AND LIST OF THE PETITIONERS

Mr. Tony Hall, Director-General of the BBC, Broadcasting House, Portland Place,
London, W1A 1AA

October 12, 2014

Dear Sir,
We the undersigned, scholars, scientists, researchers, journalists and historians are writing to you today to express our grave concern at the content of the documentary Rwanda's Untold Story (This World, BBC 2, Wednesday, October 1), specifically its coverage of the 1994 genocide of the Tutsi.

We accept and support that it is legitimate to investigate, with due diligence and respect for factual evidence, any crimes committed by the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), and to reflect on the contemporary political situation in Rwanda. However, attempts to examine these issues should not distort the reality of the 1994 genocide. It is not legitimate to use current events to either negate or to diminish the genocide. Nor is it legitimate to promote genocide denial.

The parts of the film which concern the 1994 genocide, far from providing viewers with an 'Untold Story' as the title promises, are old claims. For years similar material using similar language has been distributed far and wide as part of an on-going 'Hutu Power' campaign of genocide denial. At the heart of this campaign are convicted génocidaires, some of their defence lawyers from the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), and their supporters and collaborators. These deniers continually question the status of the genocide and try to prove – like the programme – that what it calls the 'official narrative' of the 1994 genocide is wrong. The BBC programme Rwanda's Untold Story recycles their arguments and provides them with another platform to create doubt and confusion about what really happened.

Three of the untenable claims made in the programme are of the utmost concern: the first is a lie about the true nature of the Hutu Power militia. The second is an attempt to minimize the number of Tutsi murdered in the genocide, and the third is an effort to place the blame for shooting down President Habyarimana's plane on April 6, 1994 on the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF).

First, the programme allows a witness to claim that 'only ten percent of the Interahamwe (militia) were killers'. In fact, the majority of Hutu Power militia forces – estimated to have been 30,000 strong – were trained specifically to kill Tutsi at speed, and indoctrinated in a racist ideology, part of genocide planning. There is eyewitness testimony by several militia leaders who cooperated with the ICTR.

Second, the programme attempts to minimise the number of Tutsi murdered, a typical tactic of genocide deniers. The false figures cited are provided by two US academics who worked for a team of lawyers defending the génocidaires at the ICTR. They even claim that in 1994 more Hutu than Tutsi were murdered – an absurd suggestion and contrary to all the widely available research reported by Amnesty International, UNICEF, the UN Human Rights Commission, Oxfam, Human Rights Watch, Africa Rights, a UN Security Council mandated Commission of Experts and evidence submitted to the ICTR and other European courts who have successfully put on trial several perpetrators.

Third, the film argues that the shooting down of the plane on April 6, 1994 was perpetrated by the RPF. This same story was promoted by Hutu Power extremists within a few hours of the president's assassination and promoted ever since by génocidaires and a few ICTR defence lawyers.

The film pays no heed to a detailed expert report published in January 2012 by a French magistrate Judge Marc Trévidic. This contains evidence from French experts, including crash investigators, who proved scientifically that the missiles that shot down the plane came from the confines of the government-run barracks in Kanombe on the airport's perimeter – one of the most fortified places in the country, and where it would have been impossible for the RPF, armed with a missile, to penetrate.

Within hours of the president's assassination, in this carefully planned genocide, roadblocks went up all over Kigali and the Presidential Guard started to target every member of Rwanda's political opposition.

These momentous events are barely mentioned. The members of the Hutu and Tutsi pro-democracy movements were hunted down and killed, including Rwanda's Prime Minister, Agathe Uwilingiyimana, and ten UN peacekeepers from Belgium who were protecting her. These opposition politicians separately threatened the Habyarimana regime for advocating power-sharing and paid for their courage with their lives. Ignored in this film are the Hutu Power attempts to divide the internal political opposition along ethnic lines. Political violence in the film is seen only in the context of a 'civil war' between the RPF and the Habyarimana government, a smoke screen, used then and now, to hide the systematic killing of Tutsi carried out by the Hutu Power Interim Government and its militia.

The film-maker, Jane Corbin, who presented the programme, even tries to raise doubts about whether or not the RPF stopped the genocide. The authority on this subject is Lt.-General Roméo Dallaire, the Force commander of the UN Assistance Mission for Rwanda (UNAMIR), and present in Rwanda throughout the genocide. Dallaire is categorical. 'The genocide was stopped because the RPF won and stopped it', he says. Corbin ignores the testimonies of direct witnesses to what happened in 1994: Dallaire and his volunteer UN peacekeepers, Philippe Gaillard and the medics at the International Committee of the Red Cross, and Dr. James Orbinski of Médecins Sans Frontières. Years of research and writing by academics and other experts along with hours of films by journalists who work for the BBC – all of this eyewitness testimony is dismissed as if fraudulent.

In broadcasting this documentary the BBC has been recklessly irresponsible. The programme has fuelled genocide denial. It has further emboldened the génocidaires, all their supporters and those who collaborate with them. It has provided them the legitimacy of the BBC. Denial of genocide causes the gravest offence to survivors. For them, the genocide is not a distant event from 20 years ago but a reality with which they live every day.

The denial of genocide is now widely recognised as the final stage of the crime. One of the world's preeminent genocide scholars, the US Professor Greg H. Stanton, describes ten stages in genocide: classification of the population; symbolization of those classifications; discrimination against a targeted group; dehumanisation of the pariah group; organisation of the killers; polarisation of the population; preparation by the killers; persecution of the victims; extermination of the victims; and denial that the killing was genocide.

Denial, the final stage, ensures the crime continues. It incites new killing. It denies the dignity of the deceased and mocks those who survived. Denial of genocide is taken so seriously that in some European countries it is criminalized. In 2008 the Council of the European Union called upon states to criminalize genocide denial.

The 1994 genocide of the Tutsi should be treated by all concerned with the utmost intellectual honesty and rigour. We would be willing – indeed see it as our duty – to meet with journalists and to debate in a follow up programme the serious inaccuracies in Rwanda's Untold Story.

We hope that the BBC management will quickly realise the gravity of the genocide denial in Rwanda's Untold Story. We call upon the BBC to explain how the programme came to be made and the editorial decision-making which allowed it to be broadcast. In the course of any internal BBC enquiry we hope all relevant documents from the This World archive and from senior editors involved in approving the programme will be released for study.

Rwanda's Untold Story tarnishes the BBC's well-deserved reputation for objective and balanced journalism. We urge the BBC to apologise for the offence this programme has caused for all victims and survivors of the 1994 genocide in Rwanda.

--------------------

Signed

Professor Linda Melvern, Author, A People Betrayed: The Role of the West in Rwanda's Genocide; Conspiracy to Murder

Senator Roméo Dallaire, Force Commander, UNAMIR

Professor Gregory H. Stanton, President, Genocide Watch

Mehdi Ba, Journalist and Author

Bishop Ken Barham, Dr. Margaret Brearley Independent Scholar

Dr. Gerald Caplan, Author, The Preventable Genocide

Professor Frank Chalk, Professor of History/Director, Montreal Institute for Genocide and Human Rights Studies, Concordia University, Co-author, 'Mobilizing the Will to Intervene: Leadership to Prevent Mass Atrocities' (McGill-Queen's University Press, 2010)

Dr.Phil Clark, Reader in Comparative and International Politics, SOAS, University of London

Boubacar Boris Diop, Sénégal. Author, Murambi, the book of bones

Jean-François Dupaquier, Author and Expert

Hélène Dumas, Diplômée de l'IEP d'Aix-en-Provence (2003), Docteur en histoire de l'EHESS (2013)

Professor Margee Ensign, President, American University of Nigeria

Tim Gallimore, Independent genocide researcher

Peter Greaves, Former UNICEF staff member

Fred Grünfeld, Emeritus professor in International Relations, Human Rights and the Causes of Gross Human Rights Violations, Universities of Maastricht and Utrecht, Netherlands. Author, The Failure to Prevent Genocide in Rwanda: The Role of Bystanders, 2007

Dr. Helen Hintjens, Assistant Professor in Development and Social Justice, International Institute of Social Studies (ISS) The Hague

Dr. Georgina Holmes, Lecturer International Relations,
University of Portsmouth/Royal Holloway, University of London

Richard Johnson, Author, The Travesty of Human Rights Watch on Rwanda

Eric Joyce MP, Ambassador Karel Kovanda (ret), Czech Representative on the UN Security Council, 1994-95

Françoise Lemagnen, Chief Executive, Survivors Fund (SURF)

Ambassador Stephen Lewis, Former Canadian Ambassador to the UN.

W. Alan McClue, Visiting Fellow, Bournemouth University/Cranfield University

Roland Moerland, Ph.D. Researcher and Lecturer in Supranational and Organizational Criminology, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology Maastricht University, The Netherlands

George Monbiot, Author and Journalist

Jacques Morel, Author, La France au coeur du génocide des Tutsi (2010)

Barbara Mulvaney, International Law Consultant; Former Senior Trial Attorney - Bagosora et al., United Nations International Tribunal for Rwanda

Dr. Jude Murison, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh

Peter Raymont, President, White Pine Pictures, Toronto, Canada

Professor Josias Semujanga, Professeur titulaire, Département des littératures de langue française, Université de Montréal, Quebec

Jonathan Salt, Managing Director of Ojemba Education

Keith Somerville, Senior Research fellow, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London; Lecturer in Communications and Humanitarianism, Centre for Journalism, University of Kent

Patrick de Saint-Exupéry, Author and journalist

Dr James M. Smith, CBE CEO, Aegis Trust

Rafiki Ubaldo, Journalist

Andrew Wallis, Author, Silent Accomplice: The untold Story of the Role of France in the Rwandan Genocide, I.B.Tauris, 2014

Lillian Wong, O.B.E., British Chargé d'Affaires in Rwanda 1994-1995

 

Source:

http://www.newtimes.co.rw/section/article/2014-10-14/181938/

******

 

 

__._,_.___

---

Posted by: Samuel Desire <sam4des@yahoo.com>

---

Reply via web post

•

Reply to sender

•

Reply to group

•

Start a New Topic

•

Messages in this topic (3)

----------------------------------------------------------
The Voice of the Poor, the Weak and Powerless.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Post message:  AfricaRealities@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: AfricaRealities-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: AfricaRealities-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: AfricaRealities-owner@yahoogroups.com
__________________________________________________________________

Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-http://www.africarealities.com/

-https://www.facebook.com/africarealities

Visit Your Group

• Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

.

__,_._,___