Rwanda History: [RwandaLibre] FW: [corrected] Misleading petition from Kagame’s consultants, research, journalists, workers and supporters criticises the BBC programme abut Rwandan genocide: [1 Attachment]

Tuesday, 28 October 2014

[RwandaLibre] FW: [corrected] Misleading petition from Kagame’s consultants, research, journalists, workers and supporters criticises the BBC programme abut Rwandan genocide: [1 Attachment]

Chers amis tous, nous exploitons maintenant " Recensement de general de la population et de l''habitat au 15 aout 1991. Resultats definitifs. Avril 1994" . http://www.musabyimana.be/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/2008/critique-mucyo-documents-reference-1/19910815-%20Recensement%20g%E9n%E9ral%20Population.PDF

La page 124-126 est tres eloquent ou on lit approximativement ceci.

"Au 15 Aout 1991, totale population rwandaise 7 009 844, Hutu 91.1 Tutsi 8.4.

En 1952, totale population X , Hutu 81.5 Tutsi 17.5.

En 1970, totale population X1 , Hutu 89 Tutsi 10.9.

En 1978, totale population X2 , Hutu 89.7 Tutsi 8.4.

De 1952 a 1978, les Hutu ont gagne 7.5 points et les tutsi en ont perdu autant. La declaration de l'ethnie (Hutu et Tutsi) n'est pas chose aisee au Rwanda, car certains la changent pour prendre celle de l'ethnie qui est au pouvoir. La surestimation des Tutsi en 1952 (pouvoir Tutsi ), le depart des Tutsi en exil en 1959-1960, et meme la difference eventuelle en productivite un peu moins chez la femme Tutsi que celle Hutu et Twa?), la surestimation des Hutu en 1970 (pouvoir Hutu) est aussi un obstacle pour connaitre le vrai nombre de Tutsi et de Hutu au Rwanda. Le taux de croissance de la population etait de 3.1% entre 1978-1991 (page 31), de 3.8 entre 1970-1978 (p13)".

Avec ces informations , nous allons pousser plus loin nos calculs en performant 2 scenarions. Nous partons toujours de la population proposee en 1950 de 2072000 avec respectivement 15% de Tutsi; 3.1% de taux de croissance des Rwandais et 17,5% de Tutsi; taux de croissance de population rwandaise donnes par les recensements sauf pour les annees 1950-1969 ou le taux est pose a 3,5% (car non trouve dans les recensements). Nous ignorons la difference de productivite entre femmes de differents groupes Hutu, Tutsi et Twa ainsi que la manie de changement de groupe ethnique pour se coller a l'ethnie qui regne (un avantage envers ceux du groupe qui regnait en 1950).

Le bilan de calcul avec deux scenarios est sans appel: des non-tutsi se trouvent aussi dans les memorials rwandais (voila tableau en Excel ci-attache). Les + 400000 refugies rwandais qui ont attaque en 1990 pour rentrer au Rwanda proviendraient d'un scenario ou les departs en exil en 1959-1960 ont ete entre 5 et 6% preleves sur les 17,5% du groupe Tutsi donne en 1950 et un depart pose a environ 0,1% en 1972 (voir ligne 36 et 37 dans Excel). Si on accepte le % des departs plus eleves, on se precipite alors inexorablement vers les resultats de calculs des deux professeurs americains.

Le pourcentage de Tusi a 15% en 1950 avec un taux de croissance unique de 3,1 diminue beaucoup le nombre de corps Tutsi dans les memorials, sutout lorsqu'on considere le nombre de rescapes presentes par Ibuka ainsi que celui des departs d'ou sont nes environ 400000 refugies qui ont attaque le Rwanda en 1990. Des demographes peuvent nous aider en nous donnant le chiffre veritable des rescapes Tutsi ainsi que le nombre de refugies Tutsi en 1990-1994 pour ameliorer notre tableau Excel.

Incroyables sont les resultats a la ligne 31 dans Excel ci-attache, qui correspondent plus ou moins au chiffre de 800000 Tutsi tues en 100 jours donne par l'ONU!

Voila ! Que personne ne nous accuse de rien. Nous ne nions pas le genocide mais en tant qu'intellectuels, nous voulons eclairer de quoi il est exactement fait. Soyons suffisamment genereux et courageux pour ne pas leguer a nos descendants un colis scele mais rempli de choses inexplicables et inexpliquees.

Nous avons appris les mathematiques pour les utiliser, raison pour laquelle nous pouvons verifier le bien fonde des certaines donnees utilisees emotionnellement et politiquement. C'est notre droit legitime et meme notre devoir en tant que Rwandais intellectuels. Que qui veut/peut nous fournisse d'autres bases de calcul et nous y allons.

Archimede ne disait-il pas ceci: "Donne- moi le point d'appui et je souleve le monde"; Galilee avant d'avoir sa tete coupee par les fanatiques, de dire: "Et pourtant elle (la terre) tourne (autour du soleil)" et Sire Kagame n'a-t-il pas fraye ce chemin:''Laissez les sentiments au tiroir (a cote) et voyons les faits limpides et clairs"?

To: fondationbanyarwanda@yahoogroupes.fr; radioitahuka@gmail.com; mrp.abasangizi@yahoo.com; africdossier@googlegroups.com; akagera@yahoogroups.com; rwandalibre@yahoogroups.com; sam4des@yahoo.com; sibomanaxyz999@gmail.com; nuwacu@yahoo.fr; nzinink@yahoo.com; jambonewsteam@yahoo.fr; jngarambe2000@yahoo.fr; clvidal@ehess.fr; congokin-tribune-bounces@congokingroupes.com; rudahi20@hotmail.com; ismail.mbonigaba@yahoo.fr; ikazeiwacu1@gmail.com; fmunyabagisha@hotmail.com; nkiko.nsengimana@bluewin.ch; emasozera@hotmail.com
From: fondationbanyarwanda@yahoogroupes.fr
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:46:05 +0200
Subject: [fondationbanyarwanda] FW: [RwandaLibre] Misleading petition from Kagame's consultants, research, journalists, workers and supporters criticises the BBC programme abut Rwandan genocide:

Yes, they are there, those who fight for the genocide in Rwanda! But better avoid doing like flying someone into the middle of Lake Victoria, and tell him they won't kill him, but throw him out of the craft anyway.

Why don't they explain BBC how they are right with their figures in Rwanda, as the example shown below?

"A. Si par hasard Dr Deo Byanafashe, historien et prof a l'UNR, aurait dit en avril 2013 que lors du dernier recencement de la periode coloniale le nombre de Tutsi n'arrivait pas a 1000 (posting Semahoro), une telle declaration serait pour le moins extremenet grave!

Car , a supposer que ce recencement aurait eu lieu lors du partage de l'Afrique a Berlin en 1885, alors en 1994 (soit 110 ans apres), sur base d'une estimation de taux de croissance de ce peuple a 3% annuellement, le calcul nous fournirait 25829. Avec un taux de croissance de 4%, ce nombre passerait a 74760.

Et si nous datons la colonisation en 1845, soit 150 ans apres, on aurait respectivement 84253 et 358923 personnes pour 3 et 4% de croissance demographique.

B. Si nous prenons la population rwandaise totale indiquee a Google/ Wikipedia, de 2072000 en 1950 avec 15% de Tutsi et 3,1% de croissance annuelle, sans considerer les pertes (tues et departs en exil de Tutsi) en 1959-1960 et 1972, en 1994 soit 44 plus tard, nous aurions (2072000 *15/100)* (1+31/1000)⁴⁴ = 1190864 .

Fondation Hirondelle (2002) donne par ailleurs "1 074 017 morts, bilan officiel publié par le ministère rwandais de l'administration du territoire, à l'issue d'un recensement effectué en juillet 2000 (noter la difference de donnees de calcul et donnees de recencement de 116 846 sur base de l'an 1950).

Le meme calcul fait sur la population totale donne 7939095 rwandais contre 7 110 000 donnes en 1990.

C. Mais les Tutsi ont souffert pendant et depuis l'avenement de la Republique, prenons-en compte, S.V.P.!

Calculons en guise d'example sur base de l'an 1950 et le taux de croissance demographique de 3,1% et en tenant compte des effets pervers de 1959-1960 (avec cing niveaux de pertes: 1 a 5%) et ceux de 1972-1973 (avec un seul niveau de perte de 0,1%).

On a ainsi:

1. 1% de pertes en 1959-1960. En 1961, la population Tutsi etait 405332 avec une perte 28953. En 1972 cette popualtion etait 584691,3. Avec les effets negatifs de 71-72 de 0,1%, equivalent a 4176 personnes manquantes, alors en 1990-1994, on aurait 1110362 Tutsi. Les survivants Tutsi du genocide seraient alors 1110362-1074017= 36345. Les signataires de la petition devraient dire a BBC Combien de survivants nous avons en realite aujourd'hui?

2. Si les evenements de 1959-60 ont cause la perte de 2%, les tutsi en 1994 seraient 1031050 avec donc 42967 Hutu aux memorials et aucun survivant Tutsi.

3. Si les evenements de 1959-1960 auraient pris 3%, les tutsi en 1994 seraient 951738 avec donc 122278 Hutu aux memorials et aucun survivant Tutsi.

4. Si les evenements de 1959-1960 ant provoque la diminution de 4%, les tutsi en 1994 seraient 872427 avec donc 201590 Hutu aux memorials et aucun survivant Tutsi.

5. Si les evenements de 1959-1960 auraient pris 5% les tutsi en 1994 seraient 793115 avec donc 280901 Hutu aux memorials et aucun survivant Tutsi.

Voila le depart pour ameliorer nos points de vue, honnetement et intellectuellement, chers nautes.

Evitons vraiment des attaques personnelles, indignes et armes injustement utilisees par ceux qui s'acharnent a coller a tort et a travers des genocides dans ce monde devenu tres dangereux. Surfons sur des faits et non sur les emotions, s.v.p. et demandons a ces signataires plutot d'expliquer a BBC leur point avec des faits et non avec des oui-dires ou declarations politiciennes.
RPF a attaque le Rwanda des octobre 1990 "pour liberer les Tutsi accables par les mauvais regimes Hutu et pour rentrer d'exil".

Serait-il donc possible que le taux de croissance de 3.1% pour Tutsi ait eu lieu avec ces mechants Hutu?

Si la reponse est oui, alors il y a sujet a eclaircir que les signataires de cette petition doivent a BBC. Et si le taux etait moindre, alors le calcul des prof americains, meme s'il serait inexact, a un quelque merite que les signataires doivent reconnaitre!

Et combien de Tutsi ont -ils ete tues en 1959-1960, en 1972, combien sont-ils partis en exil en ces periodes?

Si les estimations de pertes (mort et exil) utilisees dans les presents calculs sont faibles alors les prof americains n'ont pas completement tort. Et si elles sont trop elevees, alors la maltraitance des Tutsi par les Hutu devient en quelque sorte relative et ne meriteraient pas la furie extreme de nos experts chantres du genocide.

Le genocide ne devrait pas etre un acte de foi avec ses chantres humains declares infailblle, mais il est quelquechose de monstrueux qui doit donc pour cela etre supporte par des actes et faits dument expliques et prouves.

Le missionnaire pour hypnotiser ses chretiens leur enseignait que s'ils machent l'eucharistie consacree ou qu'ils la touchent et la rompent dans leurs mains, du sang remplirait leur bouche et leur pays en plus d'etre exclus de la sainte Eglise. Tel temps est revolu, et que de grace nos expert signataires ci-dessous s'en rendent aussi compte , S.V.P.!"'

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Samuel Desire sam4des@yahoo.com [RwandaLibre]

14/10/2014

Groupes

À : Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr, africarealities@yahoogroups.com, rwandalibre@yahoogroups.com

This is a petition that jeopardises the intellectual integrity of these so-called scholars. It is about protecting their consultancy jobs and money offered to them by Kagame despite some of them being paid by the institutions they are working for . Others are freelancers who need money to live on. Others are paying back for the past money that they received from Kagame. It is a shame on these scholars to sign a such empty petition.

From: "Samuel Desire sam4des@yahoo.com [Democracy_Human_Rights]" <Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr>
To: "Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr" <Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr>; "africarealities@yahoogroups.com" <africarealities@yahoogroups.com>; "rwandalibre@yahoogroups.com" <rwandalibre@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 14 October 2014, 20:33
Subject: Re: *DHR* Misleading and inaccurate petition from Kagame's consultants, research, journalists, workers and supporters criticises the BBC programme abut Rwandan genocide:

The war criminal and dictator Kagame has used his consultants to deny his war crimes and crimes against humanity. The consultants have found themselves in an embarrassing situation when they were asked by Kagame to sign the petition below( prepared by Kagame). These Kagame's consultants and workers could not refuse to sign the petition due to the consultancy jobs and bribes they were offered in the past and other consultancy opportunities they are expecting in the future.

It is also well known that that BBC journalists who were reporting Kagame's war under his protection were frequently shown the dead corpses of Hutus killed by the RPF as Tutsi corpses killed by the Interahamwe. These tactics are well-known in guerrilla wars. This is why the number of killed Tutsi still don't add up and the higher and magic figures of massacred Tutsi have become a mystery.

To: Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr; africarealities@yahoogroups.com; realitesafricaines@yahoogroupes.fr; rwandalibre@yahoogroups.com
From: RwandaLibre@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:47:08 +0000
Subject: [RwandaLibre] Misleading petition from Kagame's consultants, research, journalists, workers and supporters criticises the BBC programme abut Rwandan genocide:

Misleading petition from Kagame's consultants, research, journalists, workers and supporters criticises the BBC programme abut Rwandan genocide

Kagame is well known to be using bribes to attract support from white people from USA and Britain.

A group of international consultants who have been working for Kagame for the last 20 years have now criticised the BBC programme in relation to Rwandan genocide. The letter was prepared by Kagame and circulated by the Rwandan Embassy in the UK for signature by these consultants.

Among people who have signed the petition below include representatives of NGOs who have using genocide cards to get British money to fund their NGOs. Andrew Walllis was paid £150,000 by Kagame to create his Open Democracy website and write the book "Silent Accomplice: The untold Story of the Role of France in the Rwandan Genocide, I.B.Tauris, 2014". Even Romeo Dallaire who failed to prevent the genocide because of his lack of neutrality during the conflict in his role as representative of UN mission to Rwanda has signed the petition. Romeo Dallaire supported Kagame's war in order to remove the former regime of Habyarimana.

It is even strange to see that the content of the letter is referring to the investigations by Judge Marc Trévidic to support the consultants' arguments while the dictator and war criminal Kagame, Andrew Wallis and Linda Melvern have been documenting and accusing France of their involvement in the Rwandan genocide. It is well known that any different view to Kagame's version of the history of Rwandan genocide is considered by the war criminal and dictator Kagame as genocide revisionism. BBC was right to ignore these investigations because they are not credible and have not yet provided any answer to who shot the plane that was carrying two Presidents and their crew and entourage. The French approach to this matter has been repentance rather than finding the truth. In addition to this, the preliminary outcome of French investigations do not conclude that the plane was not shot by Kagame. So, it was not necessary for BBC to refer to them while investigations have not yet been completed.

The content of the consultants' letter written to BBC is not credible because these consultants have been working for Kagame for many years, paid to write books about him and his war, to represent him abroad and in various international conferences, They received financial support from Kagame to attend various conferences related to genocide. These consultants have not provided contradictory facts about the fake numbers of Tutsi killed as the result of the genocide. They have never condemned the massacres, war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by Kagame in Rwanda and in DR Congo.

In this petition, no credible answer was provided by the consultants about the issues raised by BBC.

Will we have people to defend and support Kagame's version of the history of Rwandan genocide even after his death. Let's wait and see !

"Rwanda's Untold Story," BBC Documentary Offers Compelling Case Of Kagame As War Criminal - See more at: http://www.blackstarnews.com/us-politics/justice/rwandas-untold-story-bbc-documentary-offers-compelling-case-of-kagame-as-war#sthash.RShmsXd3.dpuf

BBC Asks 'What Really Happened in Rwanda? History of the Genocide. Role of the US

http://www.globalresearch.ca/bbc-asks-what-really-happened-in-rwanda-history-of-the-genocide-role-of-the-us/5407758

Relate story

FULL LETTER AND LIST OF THE PETITIONERS

Mr. Tony Hall, Director-General of the BBC, Broadcasting House, Portland Place,
London, W1A 1AA

October 12, 2014

Dear Sir,
We the undersigned, scholars, scientists, researchers, journalists and historians are writing to you today to express our grave concern at the content of the documentary Rwanda's Untold Story (This World, BBC 2, Wednesday, October 1), specifically its coverage of the 1994 genocide of the Tutsi.

We accept and support that it is legitimate to investigate, with due diligence and respect for factual evidence, any crimes committed by the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), and to reflect on the contemporary political situation in Rwanda. However, attempts to examine these issues should not distort the reality of the 1994 genocide. It is not legitimate to use current events to either negate or to diminish the genocide. Nor is it legitimate to promote genocide denial.

The parts of the film which concern the 1994 genocide, far from providing viewers with an 'Untold Story' as the title promises, are old claims. For years similar material using similar language has been distributed far and wide as part of an on-going 'Hutu Power' campaign of genocide denial. At the heart of this campaign are convicted génocidaires, some of their defence lawyers from the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), and their supporters and collaborators. These deniers continually question the status of the genocide and try to prove – like the programme – that what it calls the 'official narrative' of the 1994 genocide is wrong. The BBC programme Rwanda's Untold Story recycles their arguments and provides them with another platform to create doubt and confusion about what really happened.

Three of the untenable claims made in the programme are of the utmost concern: the first is a lie about the true nature of the Hutu Power militia. The second is an attempt to minimize the number of Tutsi murdered in the genocide, and the third is an effort to place the blame for shooting down President Habyarimana's plane on April 6, 1994 on the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF).

First, the programme allows a witness to claim that 'only ten percent of the Interahamwe (militia) were killers'. In fact, the majority of Hutu Power militia forces – estimated to have been 30,000 strong – were trained specifically to kill Tutsi at speed, and indoctrinated in a racist ideology, part of genocide planning. There is eyewitness testimony by several militia leaders who cooperated with the ICTR.

Second, the programme attempts to minimise the number of Tutsi murdered, a typical tactic of genocide deniers. The false figures cited are provided by two US academics who worked for a team of lawyers defending the génocidaires at the ICTR. They even claim that in 1994 more Hutu than Tutsi were murdered – an absurd suggestion and contrary to all the widely available research reported by Amnesty International, UNICEF, the UN Human Rights Commission, Oxfam, Human Rights Watch, Africa Rights, a UN Security Council mandated Commission of Experts and evidence submitted to the ICTR and other European courts who have successfully put on trial several perpetrators.

Third, the film argues that the shooting down of the plane on April 6, 1994 was perpetrated by the RPF. This same story was promoted by Hutu Power extremists within a few hours of the president's assassination and promoted ever since by génocidaires and a few ICTR defence lawyers.

The film pays no heed to a detailed expert report published in January 2012 by a French magistrate Judge Marc Trévidic. This contains evidence from French experts, including crash investigators, who proved scientifically that the missiles that shot down the plane came from the confines of the government-run barracks in Kanombe on the airport's perimeter – one of the most fortified places in the country, and where it would have been impossible for the RPF, armed with a missile, to penetrate.

Within hours of the president's assassination, in this carefully planned genocide, roadblocks went up all over Kigali and the Presidential Guard started to target every member of Rwanda's political opposition.

These momentous events are barely mentioned. The members of the Hutu and Tutsi pro-democracy movements were hunted down and killed, including Rwanda's Prime Minister, Agathe Uwilingiyimana, and ten UN peacekeepers from Belgium who were protecting her. These opposition politicians separately threatened the Habyarimana regime for advocating power-sharing and paid for their courage with their lives. Ignored in this film are the Hutu Power attempts to divide the internal political opposition along ethnic lines. Political violence in the film is seen only in the context of a 'civil war' between the RPF and the Habyarimana government, a smoke screen, used then and now, to hide the systematic killing of Tutsi carried out by the Hutu Power Interim Government and its militia.

The film-maker, Jane Corbin, who presented the programme, even tries to raise doubts about whether or not the RPF stopped the genocide. The authority on this subject is Lt.-General Roméo Dallaire, the Force commander of the UN Assistance Mission for Rwanda (UNAMIR), and present in Rwanda throughout the genocide. Dallaire is categorical. 'The genocide was stopped because the RPF won and stopped it', he says. Corbin ignores the testimonies of direct witnesses to what happened in 1994: Dallaire and his volunteer UN peacekeepers, Philippe Gaillard and the medics at the International Committee of the Red Cross, and Dr. James Orbinski of Médecins Sans Frontières. Years of research and writing by academics and other experts along with hours of films by journalists who work for the BBC – all of this eyewitness testimony is dismissed as if fraudulent.

In broadcasting this documentary the BBC has been recklessly irresponsible. The programme has fuelled genocide denial. It has further emboldened the génocidaires, all their supporters and those who collaborate with them. It has provided them the legitimacy of the BBC. Denial of genocide causes the gravest offence to survivors. For them, the genocide is not a distant event from 20 years ago but a reality with which they live every day.

The denial of genocide is now widely recognised as the final stage of the crime. One of the world's preeminent genocide scholars, the US Professor Greg H. Stanton, describes ten stages in genocide: classification of the population; symbolization of those classifications; discrimination against a targeted group; dehumanisation of the pariah group; organisation of the killers; polarisation of the population; preparation by the killers; persecution of the victims; extermination of the victims; and denial that the killing was genocide.

Denial, the final stage, ensures the crime continues. It incites new killing. It denies the dignity of the deceased and mocks those who survived. Denial of genocide is taken so seriously that in some European countries it is criminalized. In 2008 the Council of the European Union called upon states to criminalize genocide denial.

The 1994 genocide of the Tutsi should be treated by all concerned with the utmost intellectual honesty and rigour. We would be willing – indeed see it as our duty – to meet with journalists and to debate in a follow up programme the serious inaccuracies in Rwanda's Untold Story.

We hope that the BBC management will quickly realise the gravity of the genocide denial in Rwanda's Untold Story. We call upon the BBC to explain how the programme came to be made and the editorial decision-making which allowed it to be broadcast. In the course of any internal BBC enquiry we hope all relevant documents from the This World archive and from senior editors involved in approving the programme will be released for study.

Rwanda's Untold Story tarnishes the BBC's well-deserved reputation for objective and balanced journalism. We urge the BBC to apologise for the offence this programme has caused for all victims and survivors of the 1994 genocide in Rwanda.

--------------------

Signed

Professor Linda Melvern, Author, A People Betrayed: The Role of the West in Rwanda's Genocide; Conspiracy to Murder

Senator Roméo Dallaire, Force Commander, UNAMIR

Professor Gregory H. Stanton, President, Genocide Watch

Mehdi Ba, Journalist and Author

Bishop Ken Barham, Dr. Margaret Brearley Independent Scholar

Dr. Gerald Caplan, Author, The Preventable Genocide

Professor Frank Chalk, Professor of History/Director, Montreal Institute for Genocide and Human Rights Studies, Concordia University, Co-author, 'Mobilizing the Will to Intervene: Leadership to Prevent Mass Atrocities' (McGill-Queen's University Press, 2010)

Dr.Phil Clark, Reader in Comparative and International Politics, SOAS, University of London

Boubacar Boris Diop, Sénégal. Author, Murambi, the book of bones

Jean-François Dupaquier, Author and Expert

Hélène Dumas, Diplômée de l'IEP d'Aix-en-Provence (2003), Docteur en histoire de l'EHESS (2013)

Professor Margee Ensign, President, American University of Nigeria

Tim Gallimore, Independent genocide researcher

Peter Greaves, Former UNICEF staff member

Fred Grünfeld, Emeritus professor in International Relations, Human Rights and the Causes of Gross Human Rights Violations, Universities of Maastricht and Utrecht, Netherlands. Author, The Failure to Prevent Genocide in Rwanda: The Role of Bystanders, 2007

Dr. Helen Hintjens, Assistant Professor in Development and Social Justice, International Institute of Social Studies (ISS) The Hague

Dr. Georgina Holmes, Lecturer International Relations,
University of Portsmouth/Royal Holloway, University of London

Richard Johnson, Author, The Travesty of Human Rights Watch on Rwanda

Eric Joyce MP, Ambassador Karel Kovanda (ret), Czech Representative on the UN Security Council, 1994-95

Françoise Lemagnen, Chief Executive, Survivors Fund (SURF)

Ambassador Stephen Lewis, Former Canadian Ambassador to the UN.

W. Alan McClue, Visiting Fellow, Bournemouth University/Cranfield University

Roland Moerland, Ph.D. Researcher and Lecturer in Supranational and Organizational Criminology, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology Maastricht University, The Netherlands

George Monbiot, Author and Journalist

Jacques Morel, Author, La France au coeur du génocide des Tutsi (2010)

Barbara Mulvaney, International Law Consultant; Former Senior Trial Attorney - Bagosora et al., United Nations International Tribunal for Rwanda

Dr. Jude Murison, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh

Peter Raymont, President, White Pine Pictures, Toronto, Canada

Professor Josias Semujanga, Professeur titulaire, Département des littératures de langue française, Université de Montréal, Quebec

Jonathan Salt, Managing Director of Ojemba Education

Keith Somerville, Senior Research fellow, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London; Lecturer in Communications and Humanitarianism, Centre for Journalism, University of Kent

Patrick de Saint-Exupéry, Author and journalist

Dr James M. Smith, CBE CEO, Aegis Trust

Rafiki Ubaldo, Journalist

Andrew Wallis, Author, Silent Accomplice: The untold Story of the Role of France in the Rwandan Genocide, I.B.Tauris, 2014

Lillian Wong, O.B.E., British Chargé d'Affaires in Rwanda 1994-1995

Source:

http://www.newtimes.co.rw/section/article/2014-10-14/181938/

******

__._,_.___

View attachments on the web

Posted by: kota venant <kotakori@hotmail.com>

Reply via web post

•

Reply to sender

•

Reply to group

•

Start a New Topic

•

Messages in this topic (1)

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
.To post a message: RwandaLibre@yahoogroups.com; .To join: RwandaLibre-subscribe@yahoogroups.com; .To unsubscribe from this group,send an email to:
RwandaLibre-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
_____________________________________________________

More news: http://www.amakurunamateka.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-SVP, considérer environnement avant toute impression de cet e-mail ou les pièces jointes.
======
-Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Visit Your Group