http://thinkafricapress.com/rwanda/procedural-justice-trial-ingabire-caseThe Ingabire Trial: Rwanda's Contempt of Court?Opposition activist Ingabire has been denied a fair trial by expedient judges, improperly gathered evidence and a disregard for procedural justice. The trial of Victoire Ingabire getting underway in the Kigali Supreme Court. Photograph by Graham Holliday. Since her arrest in October 2010, the trial of Rwandan opposition figure Victoire Ingabire has been followed intently. Eighteen months into the proceedings, Ingabire is now awaiting a verdict on six counts relating to terrorism and genocide denial, and her case has come to symbolise the ongoing struggle over the legacy of the genocide and the future of judicial independence in Rwanda. The partisan national press was declaring Ingabire a 'divisionist' even before the arrest, while international observers have been keen to expose the trial as a sham. But without direct access to documents presented to the court, this is not the place to assess Ingabire's guilt or innocence. What we can assess here, however, are the judicial processes that govern the case and that will decide Ingabire's fate. And examining these suggests that the prosecution has virtually guaranteed that regardless of whether an acquittal or a conviction is handed down, justice will have been denied to the defendant. The case backgroundIngabire, chair of the diaspora opposition group The United Democratic Forces (FDU-Inkingi), had been living in the Netherlands from 1993 until January 2010 when she returned to Rwanda to contest the national elections the following August. Ingabire was first placed under house arrest in April, three months after giving a speech at theKigali Genocide Memorial Centre in which she questioned why Hutu victims of the genocide were forgotten while also insisting on the need for national reconciliation and justice for the many Tutsi who were murdered. She was eventually released on conditional bail and repeatedly interrogated over the summer. Meanwhile, the FDU's petition for official status as a political party was rejected, effectively excluding the group from the polls. Ingabire's re-arrest in October was on suspicion of "threatening national security and public order" and of "buying and distributing arms and ammunitions to the terrorist organisation" the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), a rebel group operating out of Burundi and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Also implicated in this "plot to destabilise the country" was Paul Rusesabagina, the manager of Mille Collines Hotel, whose heroic protection of refugees during the 1994 genocide were depicted in the film Hotel Rwanda. In the end, the state decided to charge Ingabire alongside alleged co-conspirators Colonel Tharcisse Nditurende, Lieutenant Colonel Noel Habiyaremye, Lieutenant Jean Marie Vianney Karuta and Major Vital Uwumuremyi. As the hearings began in Kigali High Court, further charges were added relating to "genocide ideology" and "divisionism". "Fruit of the poisonous tree"The first set of procedural troubles in the trial relate to the procurement and application of the prosecution's evidence. Before Ingabire's case began, her alleged co-conspirators appeared in court for a string of pre-trial confessions. All four pleaded guilty and asked for clemency. Yet despite Prosecutor General Martin Ngoga's claim that "there is not a single allegation they are making against her that is not supported with documentary evidence", the facts of the case rely to an extraordinary extent on their respective stories. Uwumuremyi's testimony is of particular importance to the prosecution. He alone "explained" the "coded language" of the emails he allegedly exchanged with Ingabire, as well as the Western Union money transfers of $7,000 that (he claimed) she sent for the purchase of weapons. Thus, without the guilty plea of a confessed rebel politician, the phone records and money transfers do little to condemn Ingabire. Moreover, at least two of the co-conspirators were produced for the trial through irregular means: namely, being arrested in Burundi, involuntarily repatriated, and incarcerated for seven months in extrajudicial detention. During this time, they were denied access to counsel and family, and subjected to frequent interrogations by Rwandan intelligence services. And the prosecution does not deny this story: queried about the matter, Prosecutor General Ngoga simply replied, "those are arguments meant to avoid [the] real substance of the case". In addition to the difficulties of producing evidence, the prosecution also seems to have ignored the rules governing its use. Most notably, papers collected at Ingabire's home in the Netherlands were released to the Rwandan government by the Dutch Foreign Ministry after a protracted legal battle, and only with the guarantee that the 600-page portfolio would be used to prosecute the charge of terrorism. Yet it is unclear to what extent this evidentiary dividing wall has been maintained; prosecutors, for example, claim that the Dutch documents prove involvement in the FDLR and therefore conspiracy against the government. Formal use of the files to prove these charges would be flatly illegal, but even informal consideration (for instance, influencing the court's opinion of her character) is clearly prejudicial. Making things difficultThe second dimension of procedural injustice follows the general means by which the state has allegedly impeded Ingabire's defence. Such problems appeared from the start: in the days following her re-arrest, FDU officials claimed that Ingabire was forced to wear handcuffs while in detention for at least two days without respite, a charge denied vehemently by the police. Outside the courtroom, biased coverage of Ingabire's trial signals the breakdown of judicial independence, especially in the pages of government-aligned dailies that dominate the national press. In one case, President Paul Kagame explicitly asserted Ingabire's guilt. More directly, officially-sanctioned reporting often borders on defamation. Throughout her trial, media outlets have compared her to Osama bin Laden, Hamas, and the Nazis – the presumption of innocence notwithstanding. Furthermore, the state has reportedly applied extra-constitutional pressure on Ingabire and her defence. Not only was Ingabire allegedly denied access to her legal team and FDU colleagues, but when she was allowed to see them, it was (party officials claimed) under prosecution surveillance. Her Rwandan defence lawyer, Gatera Gashabana, also reported that the state had failed to provide Ingabire's team with all of the prosecution's evidence, hindering adequate preparation of her defence. This April, the defence also claimed intimidation of a key witness. Testifying that state intelligence services had manufactured Uwumuremyi's story, Colonel Michel Habimana was allegedly improperly interrogated by police under the direction of the Prosecutor General. Already serving life in prison, Habimana was subjected to a cell search and had important documents relating to the case seized. Whilst prosecutors maintained that this transpired within the bounds of the law, they gave no reason for the intrusion. "Fitting" the lawMost troubling, however, is the third category of procedural faults which contravene both Rwandan and international law. Such problems first arose in May 2011, when Ingabire asked for and was granted a postponement. As a British lawyer (alongside Gashabana) was leading her defence team, Ingabire was granted one additional month to translate the 2,500 documents delivered by the prosecution from Kinyarwanda into English. The presiding judge refused the request of four months for further study, claiming it would unfairly delay the trial of the her co-accused. But Ingabire and her alleged conspirators face charges deserving of separate trials. Firstly, the defendants were apprehended entirely independently of one another. Secondly, while the men are FDLR commanders accused of physical violence, Ingabire is a politician charged with only economically and rhetorically supporting their military campaigns. Thus, while falling under the broad aegis of 'terrorism', their alleged crimes are fundamentally different. The government implicitly recognised this when it divided the six charges against Ingabire into two blocs, trying her for three of the charges (divisionism, genocide ideology, and inciting revolt) as an individual – but then extra-legally swapping evidence between the two sets of crimes. Collaborators' testimony on monetary transactions, for example, has been smuggled into an entirely separate case on Ingabire's alleged 'divisionism'. And the possibility of having separate trials has been denied despite substantial objections against linking the cases. In other instances, the prosecution has openly manipulated the law. During pre-trial formalities in September, Ingabire's defence lodged two motions. The first was against the territorial jurisdiction of the High Court for acts allegedly committed while Ingabire was resident in the Netherlands – this contention was dismissed the following week. Justice Rutazana decided that the relevant statute should be interpreted to grant the High Court jurisdiction over any crime, irrespective of where it was committed, as long as the offence in question constitutes an international crime such as terrorism or genocide denial. Though the law is radically out of sync with international standards for 'universal jurisdiction', Rutazana appears here to have followed the letter of the statute. Troubles emerged, however, in the dismissal of the defence's second motion – the contention that Ingabire's prosecution under the 2008 'genocide ideology' law amounted to retrospective application. All evidence provided dated from before 2007. For instance, a book published in 2000 (to which Ingabire was connected) motivated the prosecution's charges of divisionism and incitement to revolt, while statements she made in July and October of the same year formed the basis on which the genocide ideology charge was levied. Ingabire asked for all such documentation relating to events before the law's enactment be removed from her file, which the judge denied. The legal basis of Rutazana's decision was flimsy: the case had simply gone too far to grant the request, he explained. At the time of this dismissal, the trial had not yet officially begun. Finally, this April, the court rejected Ingabire's petition for a partial suspension of the trial pending the ongoing revision of the 'genocide ideology' law. Justifying this move, the Supreme Court cited her failure to attach a copy of the statute. The case that could potentially imprison a leading opposition figure for life thus proceeded on the grounds that she had neglected to paperclip to the file a copy of a law to which, in any case, the justices have easy access. Method mattersIngabire may well be guilty of some, if not all, the charges levied against her. It is possible that she directed FDU monies to the FDLR for the purpose of inciting violence against the state. It is also possible that she supports 'divisionism' and 'genocide ideology' as defined by Rwandan statute. Although her guilt appears unlikely to this author, it is a challenge that can at least be countenanced in Rwanda's courts. This legal battle, however, is constrained by a bevy of laws guaranteeing Ingabire a fair hearing. Article 19 of the Constitution provides, inter alia, that "every person accused of a crime shall be presumed innocent until his or her guilt has been conclusively proved in accordance with the law in a public and fair hearing". Additionally, Rwanda affirms its commitment to enforcing numerous international agreements such as the African (Banjul) Charter of Human and Peoples' Rights of 27 June 1981, which containsextensive provisions for due process. It is clear from the foregoing analysis that none of these appear to have exerted any influence over the prosecution of this case. Evidence has been gathered and deployed improperly. Strong-arm tactics have repeatedly hindered Ingabire's defence, while a government-controlled media has gleefully convicted her in the court of public opinion. Most worryingly, however is that the presiding judges have adopted legal interpretations according to expedience in a number of instances. Substantial challenges to the prosecution of Ingabire's case have been allowed to lapse, and the numerous safeguards for procedural justice have been violated in principle if not in statute. Awaiting a verdictIngabire's verdict is slated for June 29. As she is now boycotting the trial entirely, she seems likelyto receive life in prison. Looking beyond this case, however, such violations of due process may lead the international community to row back on cooperation with the Rwandan judiciary. This is of growing concern for Western policymakers. Prior to Ingabire's trial, there had been numerous indications of growing trust in Rwanda's legal system. In January, Canada deported Leon Mugesera, allegedly one of the genocide's masterminds, for trial. The same month, the United States turned over Jean-Marie Vianney Mudahinyuka, reportedly a former interahamwe leader. Furthermore, April saw the first-ever transfer from the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) to the national courts, in the case of genocide suspect Jean Bosco Uwinkindi. As long as the West continues to willingly transfer such suspects to Rwanda, it will be complicit in gross miscarriages of justice. Rwandans are correct to assert the right of trying genocide suspects at home, and it is incontestable that justice depends on those responsible – particularly such unsavoury characters as Mugesera – being held to account. But even those most guilty of atrocities should receive fair trials. Procedural justice must be pursued with equal vigour as the outcomes of justice are currently. Rwanda must ask herself whether commitments to individual human rights are worth sacrificing in support of Rwandan sovereignty and communal justice. Think Africa Press welcomes inquiries regarding the republication of its articles. If you would like to republish this or any other article for re-print, syndication or educational purposes, please contact: editor@thinkafricapress.com |
Wednesday, 24 October 2012
The Ingabire Trial: Rwanda's Contempt of Court?
-“The root cause of the Rwandan tragedy of 1994 is the long and past historical ethnic dominance of one minority ethnic group to the other majority ethnic group. Ignoring this reality is giving a black cheque for the Rwandan people’s future and deepening resentment, hostility and hatred between the two groups.”
-« Ce dont j’ai le plus peur, c’est des gens qui croient que, du jour au lendemain, on peut prendre une société, lui tordre le cou et en faire une autre ».
-“The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.”
-“I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.”
-“The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.”
READ MORE RECENT NEWS AND OPINIONS
-
▼
2012
(689)
-
▼
October
(233)
- Rwanda : Victoire Ingabire 's Trial Chronology
- Rwanda: 8 years for Victoire Ingabire
- UK rethinking budget support to Kagame’s Rwanda
- Implicated in Congo crimes, Rwanda’s Gen. Kagame h...
- Rwanda should give opponents political space not p...
- Ingabire’s daughter: “You get used to it”
- Opposition leader Victoire Ingabire sentenced to e...
- Documentary: Victoire Ingabire vs Paul Kagame
- Rwanda's Big Sham: The Political Trial And Convict...
- RWANDA NATIONAL CONGRESS (RNC) CONDEMNS KAGAME'S R...
- Rwanda: Ensure appeal after unfair Ingabire trial
- Reactions to the sentencing of Rwandan opposition ...
- Reactions to the sentencing of Rwandan opposition ...
- RWANDA NATIONAL CONGRESS (RNC) CONDEMNS KAGAME'S R...
- Rwanda: Ensure appeal after unfair Ingabire trial
- Rwanda's Big Sham: The Political Trial And Convict...
- Fw: *DHR* HRW-Rwanda : Une peine de huit années d’...
- Rwanda: Ntaganda yemera ko yakoreshaga telefoni mu...
- Rwanda: l'opposante Victoire Ingabire condamnée à ...
- Rwanda: Le verdict vient de tomber, brutal et sans...
- Rwanda: Nk’ uko twari tubitegereje, uyu munsi Mada...
- Rwanda: 8 year prison sentence for Political priso...
- Rwanda: A brutal and uncompromising verdict: Today...
- Message à Mr Paul Kagame re: Victoire Ingabire Umu...
- Rwanda: demain, la prisonnière politique Victoire ...
- Rwanda : le jugement de l’opposante Ingabire, « mo...
- Blood stains Rwanda's seat in the UN
- “Time is nothing when there is determination” Vict...
- Joseph Kabila: «Perdre le Congo, c'est perdre l'Af...
- Victoire Ingabire intwali, Victoire the Brave Woma...
- Rwanda: The Courageous Lady Revealing Kagame's Bru...
- Understanding the reason why Victoire Ingabire is ...
- Nyakubahwa perezida Kagame, gira impuhwe!
- Rwanda: Tomorrow, political prisoner Ingabire will...
- Rwanda: Two members of FDU-Inkingi abducted, 3 oth...
- Uburyo ambasade y’u Rwanda muri Tanzania ari yo ya...
- Rwanda: Gukunda igihugu no kwihesha agaciro nyabyo
- N’ubwo umuco wo gutabara usa nk’uwacitse mu bayobo...
- Rwanda: The Genocide Ideology law
- The Intrinsically Defective 'Rwandan Despot Leader...
- Documentary: Victoire Ingabire vs Paul Kagame
- Kambale Musavuli explains what US citizens could d...
- Kagame gukatira Ingabire igifungo bishobora kuzamu...
- RWANDA: Political prisoner INGABIRE verdict postpo...
- Uganda mulls peacekeeping missions after U.N. Cong...
- Re: Working Groups and terminated Sanctions Commit...
- Victoire Ingabire: Umuti w'ibibazo byugarije u Rwa...
- What is going on in Rwanda?
- New South Africa envoy to Rwanda launches business...
- Kayumba Nyamwasa refugee status case goes to S.A. ...
- Has Torture Ever Been a Secret in Rwanda?
- Rwanda: Kiliziya Gatolika yo mu Rwanda n’abakirisi...
- Rwanda: Inzego z’ubutasi za Perezida Kagame zashim...
- Rwanda: The Catholic Church and its followers have...
- Imelda Marcos of Rwanda: Jeannette Kagame has enri...
- Imelda Marcos w’u Rwanda: Jeannette Kagame amaze ...
- Rwanda : Agaciro : cotisation patriotique "volonta...
- Bruxelles:le Prix Sakharov aux Iraniens J.Panahi e...
- Rwanda: Inzego z’ubutasi za Perezida Kagame zashim...
- Kabila confronts Rwanda, Uganda over M23 rebels
- New inquiry: UK Aid to Rwanda
- Inzara mu Rwanda
- Victoire Ingabire's lawyer says her trial will not...
- Rwandan military used electric shock to force conf...
- Rwanda Gains Seat at the UN Security Council, But ...
- The Ingabire Trial: Rwanda's Contempt of Court?
- Obama to renew sanctions against those involved in...
- Re: *DHR* RWANDA: FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE...
- EU alarmed over DR Congo violence - Africa | IOL N...
- Rwanda’s role in DRC conflict questioned as UN ele...
- RADIO-ITAHUKA: MANIFESTATION YO GUSHYIGIKIRA MADAM...
- Le Rwanda au Conseil de Sécurité de l’ONU : Kagamé...
- Uganda may stop mediating in Congo over U.N. accus...
- Rwanda: The Infamous Agaciro Fund
- Defiant Rwanda calls West's bluff on aid
- (VIDEO) US Foreign Policy: President Obama's Stron...
- Iain Edwards: Victoire Ingabire's trial will not e...
- CANADA IN THE WARS IN CENTRAL AFRICA: Genocide and...
- Le Canada Dans les Guerres en Afrique Centrale: Gé...
- RDC: l'ONU menace implicitement Kigali de sanction...
- DRC: Patrick Mbeko on the admission of Rwanda to t...
- Brussels : Saturday 20 Oct, hundreds at #FreeVicto...
- Audio: Stress Testing Rwanda
- Rwanda: Assessing Risks to Stability
- UN Security Council condemns ‘any and all outside ...
- RDC : le Conseil de sécurité condamne le M23 et ex...
- Pétition: Mobilisation internationale pour la libé...
- Petition: Call for International mobilization to f...
- RWANDA: FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE RIGHTS AN...
- RDC: Le CS veut imposer des sanctions aux dirigean...
- UN/Rwanda/RDC: Le Conseil de Sécurité a exprimé so...
- Etats Unis: Obama veut soigner la « Romnésie »
- U.N. Steps Up Pressure on Rwanda
- Ushobora kwiruka ariko ntushobora kwihisha ubutabe...
- Government chief whip Andrew Mitchell finally resigns
- Rwanda: Isomwa ry'urubanza rwa Ingabire ryasubitswe
- Rwanda on the Security Council: Enabling a Dictato...
- Kabarebe, Rwanda and Congo's killing fields
- BBC News - Andrew Mitchell resigns over police com...
- UNSC condemns M23, expressed deep concern by neigh...
-
▼
October
(233)
Popular Posts
-
http://montjalinews.com/2016/07/28/amateka-yubusabane-bwabanyarwanda/ http://montjalinews.com/...
-
L'armée secrète de Kagame! D'autres hirondelles arrivent... https://www.facebook.com/share/r/hH16f5ZPiSh42emK/?mibextid=UalRPS ### ...
-
If Axel Muganwa Rudakubana had been a son of a Hutu, what would have been the news headlines in Kagame's mouthpiece tabloids? Sinc...
-
White Malice: How the CIA strangled African independence at birth | The Citizen White Malice: How the CIA strangled African independence a...
-
"L'avion a disparu du radar, le transpondeur a peut-être été désactivé, mais je pense que la plus grande probabilité est que l'...
-
Génocide au Rwanda: non-lieu confirmé en appel dans l'enquête sur l'armée française à Bisesero https://www.boursedirect.fr/en/news/c...
-
La RDC porte plainte contre Apple en France et Belgique pour «exploitation et exportation illégale» de minerais https://www.rfi.fr/fr/%C3%A9...
-
Afrikarabia » Négation du génocide des Tutsi du Rwanda : Onana condamné à Paris La XVIIe chambre du tribunal correctionnel de Paris...
-
Bashar al-Assad given asylum in Moscow, Russian media say Bashar al-Assad and his family have arrived in Moscow and been granted asylum ...
-
Syrian insurgents enter Damascus, President Assad flees Syria | AP News Syrian insurgents enter Damascus, President Assad flees Syria | ...
WebMD Health Channel - Sex & Relationships
Love Lectures
How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa
David DeAngelo - Dating Questions For Men
Christian Carter - Dating Questions For Women
Women - The Huffington Post
Recent Articles About Effective Communication Skills and Self Development
Useful Links
- Africa Works
- Africa Development / Afrique et Developpement
- Africa Desk
- Africa Portal
- International Politics From the Margins
- Democracy in Africa
- Africa in Transition
- African Arguments
- Observatoire de l’Afrique
- International African Institute
- African Studies on H-net
- Royal African Society
- African Studies Association UK (ASAUK)
- African Studies Association (ASA)
- How we made it in Africa
- All Africa
- The Africa Report
- Think Africa Press
- Africa Desk
- African Studies Internet Resource at Columbia University
- African Studies Resource at Columbia University Libraries
- The Nordic Africa Institute
- The African Studies Centre at Leiden University
- African Studies Center at University of Pennsylvania
- Institute of African Studies at Carleton University
- Yale Council on African Studies
- Institute of African Studies at Emory University
- African Studies Program at University of Wisconsin
- Center for African Studies at the University of Florida
- African Studies at Johns Hopkins University
- African and African Diaspora Studies at Boston College
- African Studies Center at Boston University
- African Studies Program at Ohio University
- African Studies Centre at Michigan State University
- Harvard’s Committee on African Studies
- Institute for African Studies at Columbia University
- African Studies Centre at University of Bradford
- Africa Regional Interest Group at Durham University
- Centre of African Studies at SOAS
- Centre of African Studies at University of Edinburgh (UK) :
- Centre for the Study of African Economics at University of Oxford
- United Nations. ReliefWeb
- Institut de recherche pour le developpement
- Global Issues That Affect Everyone
- Africa Files
- Centre for the Study of Human Rights
- Institute for Holocaust and Genocide Studies
- Harvard University Committee on Human Rights Studies
- Institute for the Study of Human Rights
- Montreal Institute For Genocide and Human Rights Studies
- Cohen Center for Holocaust & Genocide Studies
- Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies
- The Center for Human Rights and Genocide Studies
- Strassler Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies
- International Institute for Genocide and Human Rights Studies
- The Stanley Burton Centre for Holocaust and Genocide Studies
- The Genocide Studies Program
- Institute for Anthropological Research in Africa
- The Association of African Universities (AAU)
- The British Institute in Eastern Africa
- The Africa Research in Sustainable Intensification for the Next Generation (Africa RISING)
- Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa
- About Africa Research Online
- Africa Research Institute
No comments:
Post a Comment