Rwanda: The judgment on the appeal of Mrs Victoire Ingabire to the Supreme Court is set for November 1, 2013

http://www.fdu-rwanda.com/en/kinyarwanda-rwanda-urubanza-rwa-victoire-ingabire-umuhoza-ruteganyijwe-gusomwa-tariki-ya-01-ugushyingo-2013/#more-2999

 

Rwanda: The judgment on the appeal of Mrs Victoire Ingabire to the Supreme Court is set for November 1, 2013 

Kigali July 31, 2013.

 

Press release

 

The hearings in the trial of political prisoner Madame Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza, chair of FDU INKINGI continued on Wednesday, July 31, 2013 before the Supreme Court. Very many party activists made the trip to the Court to show their support.

 

As the judge had decided, at the request of the accused, to increase the frequency of weekly hearings from 2 to 3 so as to end the hearings before the judicial recess that begins early August 2013 the hearings closed on Wednesday the 31^st 2013. The hearings had started on the 25^th of March 2013.  The judgement will be read on the 1^st of November 2013. If this does not happen for any reason, the parties will be notified at least one week in advance.

 

The hearings before the Supreme Court began on 25 March 2013 following appeals made by both the Defence team of Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza and the Prosecution. Mrs Victoire Ingabire complained about flaws in the judgment in the Kigali High Court. She pointed out the blatant bias of the court to the point that she did not even have the right to reply and for the defence to make its presentation. She also highlighted to the court the fact that she had been convicted over crimes of minimization of genocide and conspiracy against the regime, while these charges were not included in the indictment, and were not mentioned during her interrogation or in court during the hearings.

 

She also complained of the violation by the Rwandan Government of the agreements that it signed with the Dutch Government regarding documents handed over to the Rwandan government in line with rogatory arrangements between the two governments.

 

For its part, the prosecution appealed, alleging that the sentence handed down by the High Court had been too lenient, despite sufficient evidence of guilt that it claimed to have produced in court.

 

The trial was marred by numerous contradictions in the testimonies of co-defendants who had given statements to prove that Ms. Ingabire was complicit in hatching a terrorist plan aimed at launching an armed rebellion. They told the court that the alleged rebel force had never existed. This was corroborated by the statement of a new witness who informed the court about the fraudulent circumstances in which the intelligence services had obtained the confession of a co-accused in order to keep Mrs Victoire Ingabire in prison and hence to prevent her from pursuing her political activities.

 

The prosecution meanwhile continued to insist on the statements made by Mrs. Ingabire at the genocide memorial in Gisozi on January 16, 2010 during her visit to pay tribute to victims of Tutsi genocide. Responding to a question from reporters, she pointed that much as the Hutu who killed Tutsi during the genocide, have to accept to face the law, she regretted that the Hutu victims killed by some elements of RPF-INKOTANYI were forgotten and that their families were not allowed to give them a decent burial as well as the failure to acknowledge each one's pain. She said that genuine reconciliation and national unity cannot be achieved without addressing these issues.

 

Although the trial of Mrs Victoire Ingabire came to an end, the authoritarian regime of President Kagame continues its campaign of repression against members of the opposition,  using the entire state apparatus, including the security services to intimidate, harass and drag unjustly to courts anyone who does not embrace the ideology and methods of the ruling Party  RPF.

 

It is in this context that Mr. Sylvain Sibomana and Dominique Shyirambere arrested during the opening of the trial March 25, 2013, continue to be abused by the regime, which has been dragging them from one court to another just to keep them in prison as long as possible. Similarly, on 11 July 2013, the court sentenced seven party members to two years, accused of failing to report the presence of the FDU-Inkingi Secretary-General ad interim party, who had met them to discuss the program of the party. They were accused of not having reported to the authorities of his presence, something that they did not have to do because he was not a wanted person by the State.

 

To these political prisoners one should add Mr. Mushayidi, Chairman of PDP Imanzi, sentenced to life imprisonment and Mr Bernard Ntaganda, President of PS Imberakuri party, sentenced to 4 years in jail.

 

The party FDU INKINGI will never give up in asking the government to reconsider its position and allow Rwandans to join political organizations of their choice, as provided by the law. The root cause of the problems faced by Rwanda, Rwandans and neighbouring countries is that the RPF regime is willing to understand that differences can be ironed out through dialogue, peaceful discussions, mutual respect and tolerance, instead of using force or terrorism to address them. This way of addressing problems can only lead to antagonism.

 

FDU-INKINGI

Boniface Twagirimana

Interim Vice President

Rwanda: The judgment on the appeal of Mrs Victoire Ingabire to the Supreme Court is set for November 1, 2013

http://www.fdu-rwanda.com/en/kinyarwanda-rwanda-urubanza-rwa-victoire-ingabire-umuhoza-ruteganyijwe-gusomwa-tariki-ya-01-ugushyingo-2013/#more-2999

 

Rwanda: The judgment on the appeal of Mrs Victoire Ingabire to the Supreme Court is set for November 1, 2013 

Kigali July 31, 2013.

 

Press release

 

The hearings in the trial of political prisoner Madame Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza, chair of FDU INKINGI continued on Wednesday, July 31, 2013 before the Supreme Court. Very many party activists made the trip to the Court to show their support.

 

As the judge had decided, at the request of the accused, to increase the frequency of weekly hearings from 2 to 3 so as to end the hearings before the judicial recess that begins early August 2013 the hearings closed on Wednesday the 31^st 2013. The hearings had started on the 25^th of March 2013.  The judgement will be read on the 1^st of November 2013. If this does not happen for any reason, the parties will be notified at least one week in advance.

 

The hearings before the Supreme Court began on 25 March 2013 following appeals made by both the Defence team of Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza and the Prosecution. Mrs Victoire Ingabire complained about flaws in the judgment in the Kigali High Court. She pointed out the blatant bias of the court to the point that she did not even have the right to reply and for the defence to make its presentation. She also highlighted to the court the fact that she had been convicted over crimes of minimization of genocide and conspiracy against the regime, while these charges were not included in the indictment, and were not mentioned during her interrogation or in court during the hearings.

 

She also complained of the violation by the Rwandan Government of the agreements that it signed with the Dutch Government regarding documents handed over to the Rwandan government in line with rogatory arrangements between the two governments.

 

For its part, the prosecution appealed, alleging that the sentence handed down by the High Court had been too lenient, despite sufficient evidence of guilt that it claimed to have produced in court.

 

The trial was marred by numerous contradictions in the testimonies of co-defendants who had given statements to prove that Ms. Ingabire was complicit in hatching a terrorist plan aimed at launching an armed rebellion. They told the court that the alleged rebel force had never existed. This was corroborated by the statement of a new witness who informed the court about the fraudulent circumstances in which the intelligence services had obtained the confession of a co-accused in order to keep Mrs Victoire Ingabire in prison and hence to prevent her from pursuing her political activities.

 

The prosecution meanwhile continued to insist on the statements made by Mrs. Ingabire at the genocide memorial in Gisozi on January 16, 2010 during her visit to pay tribute to victims of Tutsi genocide. Responding to a question from reporters, she pointed that much as the Hutu who killed Tutsi during the genocide, have to accept to face the law, she regretted that the Hutu victims killed by some elements of RPF-INKOTANYI were forgotten and that their families were not allowed to give them a decent burial as well as the failure to acknowledge each one's pain. She said that genuine reconciliation and national unity cannot be achieved without addressing these issues.

 

Although the trial of Mrs Victoire Ingabire came to an end, the authoritarian regime of President Kagame continues its campaign of repression against members of the opposition,  using the entire state apparatus, including the security services to intimidate, harass and drag unjustly to courts anyone who does not embrace the ideology and methods of the ruling Party  RPF.

 

It is in this context that Mr. Sylvain Sibomana and Dominique Shyirambere arrested during the opening of the trial March 25, 2013, continue to be abused by the regime, which has been dragging them from one court to another just to keep them in prison as long as possible. Similarly, on 11 July 2013, the court sentenced seven party members to two years, accused of failing to report the presence of the FDU-Inkingi Secretary-General ad interim party, who had met them to discuss the program of the party. They were accused of not having reported to the authorities of his presence, something that they did not have to do because he was not a wanted person by the State.

 

To these political prisoners one should add Mr. Mushayidi, Chairman of PDP Imanzi, sentenced to life imprisonment and Mr Bernard Ntaganda, President of PS Imberakuri party, sentenced to 4 years in jail.

 

The party FDU INKINGI will never give up in asking the government to reconsider its position and allow Rwandans to join political organizations of their choice, as provided by the law. The root cause of the problems faced by Rwanda, Rwandans and neighbouring countries is that the RPF regime is willing to understand that differences can be ironed out through dialogue, peaceful discussions, mutual respect and tolerance, instead of using force or terrorism to address them. This way of addressing problems can only lead to antagonism.

 

FDU-INKINGI

Boniface Twagirimana

Interim Vice President

http://mobile.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-23519330

DR Congo unrest: Rwanda 'recruiting for M23 rebels'

31 July 2013 Last updated at 17:55

The M23 denies receiving weapons from Rwanda

Four Rwandans have told the BBC the army forcibly recruited them to fight for the M23 rebel group in neighbouring eastern Democratic Republic of Congo.

The four said they were seeking asylum in Uganda after fleeing the fighting.

The Rwandan army dismissed their claim, saying they must have made up their stories to get asylum.

Last week, the US called on Rwanda to stop backing the M23. UN experts and DR Congo officials say Rwanda has been sending troops to support the rebels.

'Kagame implicated'

Some 800,000 people have been displaced in resource-rich eastern DR Congo since the M23 launched its rebellion in April 2012.

Like Rwanda's leadership, the group mostly comes from the Tutsi community.

But Rwanda denies backing the rebels.

The UN has given residents of the main city in eastern DR Congo, Goma, until 1400 GMT on Thursday to disarm, warning force will be used if they fail to do so.

A new 3,000-strong UN intervention brigade is in the area to tackle various rebels, including the M23.

The four deserters, who included a man who described himself a captain in the Rwandan army, spoke to the BBC on condition of anonymity.

He deserted after seeing many innocent people die, the man said.

He described Rwanda's President Paul Kagame as the commander-in-chief of the M23.

"Whatever he says has to be done," he said.

Mr Kagame's spokeswoman Yolande Makolo dismissed the allegations as nonsense.

"We need to stop the cycle of rumours, propaganda and blame and get on with the business of building enduring peace," she said.

Another deserter, who described himself as a medical student, told the BBC he was "kidnapped" by soldiers in the border town of Gisenyi in August 2012, and taken across the border where he treated more than 300 fellow recruits wounded in fighting.

"They took them to the frontline before finishing their training," he said.

Rwandan military spokesman Joseph Nzabamwita said he could only comment if the BBC divulged the names of their sources, adding the men must have manufactured the stories to claim asylum.

New York-based pressure group Human Rights Watch (HRW) researcher Carina Tarstaskian said HRW had received similar reports to those of the BBC.

M23 deserters told HRW that Rwandan officers provided them with military training in eastern DR Congo, she said.

HRW was also aware of several Rwandan children who were approached by civilians with the promise of jobs in eastern DR Congo, only to be recruited into M23, Ms Tarstaskian said.

http://mobile.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-23519330

DR Congo unrest: Rwanda 'recruiting for M23 rebels'

31 July 2013 Last updated at 17:55

The M23 denies receiving weapons from Rwanda

Four Rwandans have told the BBC the army forcibly recruited them to fight for the M23 rebel group in neighbouring eastern Democratic Republic of Congo.

The four said they were seeking asylum in Uganda after fleeing the fighting.

The Rwandan army dismissed their claim, saying they must have made up their stories to get asylum.

Last week, the US called on Rwanda to stop backing the M23. UN experts and DR Congo officials say Rwanda has been sending troops to support the rebels.

'Kagame implicated'

Some 800,000 people have been displaced in resource-rich eastern DR Congo since the M23 launched its rebellion in April 2012.

Like Rwanda's leadership, the group mostly comes from the Tutsi community.

But Rwanda denies backing the rebels.

The UN has given residents of the main city in eastern DR Congo, Goma, until 1400 GMT on Thursday to disarm, warning force will be used if they fail to do so.

A new 3,000-strong UN intervention brigade is in the area to tackle various rebels, including the M23.

The four deserters, who included a man who described himself a captain in the Rwandan army, spoke to the BBC on condition of anonymity.

He deserted after seeing many innocent people die, the man said.

He described Rwanda's President Paul Kagame as the commander-in-chief of the M23.

"Whatever he says has to be done," he said.

Mr Kagame's spokeswoman Yolande Makolo dismissed the allegations as nonsense.

"We need to stop the cycle of rumours, propaganda and blame and get on with the business of building enduring peace," she said.

Another deserter, who described himself as a medical student, told the BBC he was "kidnapped" by soldiers in the border town of Gisenyi in August 2012, and taken across the border where he treated more than 300 fellow recruits wounded in fighting.

"They took them to the frontline before finishing their training," he said.

Rwandan military spokesman Joseph Nzabamwita said he could only comment if the BBC divulged the names of their sources, adding the men must have manufactured the stories to claim asylum.

New York-based pressure group Human Rights Watch (HRW) researcher Carina Tarstaskian said HRW had received similar reports to those of the BBC.

M23 deserters told HRW that Rwandan officers provided them with military training in eastern DR Congo, she said.

HRW was also aware of several Rwandan children who were approached by civilians with the promise of jobs in eastern DR Congo, only to be recruited into M23, Ms Tarstaskian said.

Prophesising for Kagame is one of the signs of failing regimes.

http://www.inyenyerinews.org/afrika/the-untold-stories-prophesising-for-kagame-is-one-of-the-signs-of-failing-regimes/

Prophesising for Kagame is one of the signs of failing regimes.

August 1, 2013 by Rwema IT Webmaster Leave a Comment

 Just recently a number of elderly women from the Catholic Church walked through the posh area in Rwanda commonly known as Kiyovu towards the official residence of President Kagame with a message to repent or face both earthly and eternal fire. Unfortunately this group was rounded up by the Kagame security forces and are now under investigation and a likely hood of prosecution. But why some people pretend to carry prophesy rather than be direct to the point? During the last days of Idi Amin Dada the former president of Uganda a tortoise-was rumored to have come from Tanzania and warned Idi Amin that he should repent and stop killing people or face God's anger. Like Kagame, Idi Amin was a brutal despot who killed any living creature that was not only opposed to the dictator but also all those perceived to be dissenting from Amin's brutal rule. As I have mentioned above, a regime that does not allow a free speech to its citizen or kill all the opponents, close all the doors of political change will always be resisted using all political tactics including propaganda. Many members of the Opposition who actually are not allowed to operate inside the country and civil society have been quoted as comparing the current Rwandan regime to that of the Habyarimana's era and some don't even shy away to say that Habyarimana was more tolerant to his opponents than Kagame. President Kagame's power is so tout puissant that national institutions have to balance his interests and the Constitution. The Rwandan symbol of democracy (Parliament) has been rendered as an appendage of the Executive. Without any voice that is opposed to the brutal rule of Kagame, there is no national institution respected and inspiring enough to make historical corrections and redirect the nation. The army, as a political constituency, is at its weakest; the police, for its wear-and tear fractious engagement with the population, are very unpopular; the Judiciary has been manipulated and is used as a tool for the regime to lock up those who are perceived to oppose the regime. Indeed, people like Ingabire Victoire, Deo Mushyayidi, and Bernard Ntaganda just to mention a few have been the martyrs of democracy. Therefore, with these institutions looking like they can't offer national leadership, the people may just take up leadership themselves. There is no doubt that the prosecution, the Police and the Courts know that the arrests, charges and trial of all the above mentioned political dissents are a joke, never the less they have used former FDLR combatants who in fact should not be in the court as per the peace agreement that saw them surrendering their armed activities. But the Kagame machinery under the instructions of Kagame himself has concocted crimes against Ingabire that she gave money to the former FDLR combatants to buy grenades which were used to terrorise Kigali some time back. It is a shame that the government resources could be used not to increase the salaries of teachers, or build schools and hospitals but be used against its citizens. It is a shame that after the Kagame, Rucagu, Bamporiki project of ethnic divisions was not well perceived by the public, now Kagame's political architects are out on the defensive arguing that Kagame's project did not intend to bring back ethnic divisions. It is in this context that James Kabarebe the Minister of Defence was quoted in the media saying that RPF did not kill what he called Hutus in Congo and in Rwanda during and after the genocide was stopped. This Minister is actually loosing the point, the question is not about whether you killed Hutus or not, the question is the long time gospel of the RPF ideology that Rwanda's ethnicity is not scientific and in fact it does not exist, it is was only fabricated by the colonialists for their own political agenda, if it is the case, where does the Minister get to confirm that some people according to him were recruited basing on their ethnic background. Here shamelessly, he mentions, Gen Marcel Gatsinzi, Col. Ndengeyinka, and Ndindiriyimana, who told him these soldiers were Hutus? Unfortunately RPF and its agents of dome read Rwandan History from 1959-1994, they are making people believe that the political mismanagement of the Rwandan society does not date back to pre- colonial era and during the colonial era where the kings were used by their colonial masters to terrorise another section of the Rwandan Society. Indeed, this is not only distorting the Rwandan history but also hindering the true healing of the wounds of Rwandans who have been victims of all these eras. This has reminded me of Col Joseph Ozo, who was the Governor of Western Province, in Uganda during Amins's regime in 1972 who visited Muhokya Primary School. His tour must have been part of the mobilisation efforts after the rebel attack on Simba Battalion in Mbarara, he told pupils there who actually were too young to comprehend what he was saying to love their leaders and how the government was so strong that no one would remove it by force of arms. Therefore Kagame is now using his Generals to spread the gospel of fear in the population that he will never be removed by any force, whether by sea, land or air, Kagame will always prevail. As the tortoise told Idi Amin to leave power or will be removed by force, the tortoise moment was actually preparing an invasion of the combined forces of the Tanzanian Forces and the UNLA/F which in 1979 toppled the Uganda dictator. Therefore, the Rwandan leader should not under estimate the growing discontent inside and outside Rwanda, as a former refugee in Uganda he might be aware of the tortoise story, obviously he knows very well that his former comrade the late Gen. Fred Rwigema was among the combined forces that were sent from Tanzania under the command of the Ugandan Leader Yoweri Kaguta Museveni.

Jacqueline Umurungi Brussels.