Pages

Thursday, 1 August 2013

Prophesising for Kagame is one of the signs of failing regimes.


Prophesising for Kagame is one of the signs of failing regimes.

Kagame Just recently a number of elderly women from the Catholic Church walked through the posh area in Rwanda commonly known as Kiyovu towards the official residence of President Kagame with a message to repent or face both earthly and eternal fire. Unfortunately this group was rounded up by the Kagame security forces and are now under investigation and a likely hood of prosecution. But why some people pretend to carry prophesy rather than be direct to the point? During the last days of Idi Amin Dada the former president of Uganda a tortoise-was rumored to have come from Tanzania and warned Idi Amin that he should repent and stop killing people or face God's anger. Like Kagame, Idi Amin was a brutal despot who killed any living creature that was not only opposed to the dictator but also all those perceived to be dissenting from Amin's brutal rule. As I have mentioned above, a regime that does not allow a free speech to its citizen or kill all the opponents, close all the doors of political change will always be resisted using all political tactics including propaganda. Many members of the Opposition who actually are not allowed to operate inside the country and civil society have been quoted as comparing the current Rwandan regime to that of the Habyarimana's era and some don't even shy away to say that Habyarimana was more tolerant to his opponents than Kagame. President Kagame's power is so tout puissant that national institutions have to balance his interests and the Constitution. The Rwandan symbol of democracy (Parliament) has been rendered as an appendage of the Executive. Without any voice that is opposed to the brutal rule of Kagame, there is no national institution respected and inspiring enough to make historical corrections and redirect the nation. The army, as a political constituency, is at its weakest; the police, for its wear-and tear fractious engagement with the population, are very unpopular; the Judiciary has been manipulated and is used as a tool for the regime to lock up those who are perceived to oppose the regime. Indeed, people like Ingabire Victoire, Deo Mushyayidi, and Bernard Ntaganda just to mention a few have been the martyrs of democracy. Therefore, with these institutions looking like they can't offer national leadership, the people may just take up leadership themselves. There is no doubt that the prosecution, the Police and the Courts know that the arrests, charges and trial of all the above mentioned political dissents are a joke, never the less they have used former FDLR combatants who in fact should not be in the court as per the peace agreement that saw them surrendering their armed activities. But the Kagame machinery under the instructions of Kagame himself has concocted crimes against Ingabire that she gave money to the former FDLR combatants to buy grenades which were used to terrorise Kigali some time back. It is a shame that the government resources could be used not to increase the salaries of teachers, or build schools and hospitals but be used against its citizens. It is a shame that after the Kagame, Rucagu, Bamporiki project of ethnic divisions was not well perceived by the public, now Kagame's political architects are out on the defensive arguing that Kagame's project did not intend to bring back ethnic divisions. It is in this context that James Kabarebe the Minister of Defence was quoted in the media saying that RPF did not kill what he called Hutus in Congo and in Rwanda during and after the genocide was stopped. This Minister is actually loosing the point, the question is not about whether you killed Hutus or not, the question is the long time gospel of the RPF ideology that Rwanda's ethnicity is not scientific and in fact it does not exist, it is was only fabricated by the colonialists for their own political agenda, if it is the case, where does the Minister get to confirm that some people according to him were recruited basing on their ethnic background. Here shamelessly, he mentions, Gen Marcel Gatsinzi, Col. Ndengeyinka, and Ndindiriyimana, who told him these soldiers were Hutus? Unfortunately RPF and its agents of dome read Rwandan History from 1959-1994, they are making people believe that the political mismanagement of the Rwandan society does not date back to pre- colonial era and during the colonial era where the kings were used by their colonial masters to terrorise another section of the Rwandan Society. Indeed, this is not only distorting the Rwandan history but also hindering the true healing of the wounds of Rwandans who have been victims of all these eras. This has reminded me of Col Joseph Ozo, who was the Governor of Western Province, in Uganda during Amins's regime in 1972 who visited Muhokya Primary School. His tour must have been part of the mobilisation efforts after the rebel attack on Simba Battalion in Mbarara, he told pupils there who actually were too young to comprehend what he was saying to love their leaders and how the government was so strong that no one would remove it by force of arms. Therefore Kagame is now using his Generals to spread the gospel of fear in the population that he will never be removed by any force, whether by sea, land or air, Kagame will always prevail. As the tortoise told Idi Amin to leave power or will be removed by force, the tortoise moment was actually preparing an invasion of the combined forces of the Tanzanian Forces and the UNLA/F which in 1979 toppled the Uganda dictator. Therefore, the Rwandan leader should not under estimate the growing discontent inside and outside Rwanda, as a former refugee in Uganda he might be aware of the tortoise story, obviously he knows very well that his former comrade the late Gen. Fred Rwigema was among the combined forces that were sent from Tanzania under the command of the Ugandan Leader Yoweri Kaguta Museveni.

Jacqueline Umurungi Brussels.

Prophesising for Kagame is one of the signs of failing regimes.


Prophesising for Kagame is one of the signs of failing regimes.

Kagame Just recently a number of elderly women from the Catholic Church walked through the posh area in Rwanda commonly known as Kiyovu towards the official residence of President Kagame with a message to repent or face both earthly and eternal fire. Unfortunately this group was rounded up by the Kagame security forces and are now under investigation and a likely hood of prosecution. But why some people pretend to carry prophesy rather than be direct to the point? During the last days of Idi Amin Dada the former president of Uganda a tortoise-was rumored to have come from Tanzania and warned Idi Amin that he should repent and stop killing people or face God's anger. Like Kagame, Idi Amin was a brutal despot who killed any living creature that was not only opposed to the dictator but also all those perceived to be dissenting from Amin's brutal rule. As I have mentioned above, a regime that does not allow a free speech to its citizen or kill all the opponents, close all the doors of political change will always be resisted using all political tactics including propaganda. Many members of the Opposition who actually are not allowed to operate inside the country and civil society have been quoted as comparing the current Rwandan regime to that of the Habyarimana's era and some don't even shy away to say that Habyarimana was more tolerant to his opponents than Kagame. President Kagame's power is so tout puissant that national institutions have to balance his interests and the Constitution. The Rwandan symbol of democracy (Parliament) has been rendered as an appendage of the Executive. Without any voice that is opposed to the brutal rule of Kagame, there is no national institution respected and inspiring enough to make historical corrections and redirect the nation. The army, as a political constituency, is at its weakest; the police, for its wear-and tear fractious engagement with the population, are very unpopular; the Judiciary has been manipulated and is used as a tool for the regime to lock up those who are perceived to oppose the regime. Indeed, people like Ingabire Victoire, Deo Mushyayidi, and Bernard Ntaganda just to mention a few have been the martyrs of democracy. Therefore, with these institutions looking like they can't offer national leadership, the people may just take up leadership themselves. There is no doubt that the prosecution, the Police and the Courts know that the arrests, charges and trial of all the above mentioned political dissents are a joke, never the less they have used former FDLR combatants who in fact should not be in the court as per the peace agreement that saw them surrendering their armed activities. But the Kagame machinery under the instructions of Kagame himself has concocted crimes against Ingabire that she gave money to the former FDLR combatants to buy grenades which were used to terrorise Kigali some time back. It is a shame that the government resources could be used not to increase the salaries of teachers, or build schools and hospitals but be used against its citizens. It is a shame that after the Kagame, Rucagu, Bamporiki project of ethnic divisions was not well perceived by the public, now Kagame's political architects are out on the defensive arguing that Kagame's project did not intend to bring back ethnic divisions. It is in this context that James Kabarebe the Minister of Defence was quoted in the media saying that RPF did not kill what he called Hutus in Congo and in Rwanda during and after the genocide was stopped. This Minister is actually loosing the point, the question is not about whether you killed Hutus or not, the question is the long time gospel of the RPF ideology that Rwanda's ethnicity is not scientific and in fact it does not exist, it is was only fabricated by the colonialists for their own political agenda, if it is the case, where does the Minister get to confirm that some people according to him were recruited basing on their ethnic background. Here shamelessly, he mentions, Gen Marcel Gatsinzi, Col. Ndengeyinka, and Ndindiriyimana, who told him these soldiers were Hutus? Unfortunately RPF and its agents of dome read Rwandan History from 1959-1994, they are making people believe that the political mismanagement of the Rwandan society does not date back to pre- colonial era and during the colonial era where the kings were used by their colonial masters to terrorise another section of the Rwandan Society. Indeed, this is not only distorting the Rwandan history but also hindering the true healing of the wounds of Rwandans who have been victims of all these eras. This has reminded me of Col Joseph Ozo, who was the Governor of Western Province, in Uganda during Amins's regime in 1972 who visited Muhokya Primary School. His tour must have been part of the mobilisation efforts after the rebel attack on Simba Battalion in Mbarara, he told pupils there who actually were too young to comprehend what he was saying to love their leaders and how the government was so strong that no one would remove it by force of arms. Therefore Kagame is now using his Generals to spread the gospel of fear in the population that he will never be removed by any force, whether by sea, land or air, Kagame will always prevail. As the tortoise told Idi Amin to leave power or will be removed by force, the tortoise moment was actually preparing an invasion of the combined forces of the Tanzanian Forces and the UNLA/F which in 1979 toppled the Uganda dictator. Therefore, the Rwandan leader should not under estimate the growing discontent inside and outside Rwanda, as a former refugee in Uganda he might be aware of the tortoise story, obviously he knows very well that his former comrade the late Gen. Fred Rwigema was among the combined forces that were sent from Tanzania under the command of the Ugandan Leader Yoweri Kaguta Museveni.

Jacqueline Umurungi Brussels.

Peacekeepers in eastern Congo allowed to select surveillance drones for trial


Peacekeepers in eastern Congo allowed to select surveillance drones for trial

The United Nations has selected its first unarmed surveillance drone, an Italian-made plane that will be tried out by peacekeepers in eastern Congo.

Drone

U.N. spokesman Martin Nesirky said Thursday the world body's peacekeeping department chose an unmanned aerial vehicle produced by SELES ES, known as the Falco, which is "capable of carrying a range of payloads including several types of high-resolution sensors."

In January, the U.N. Security Council gave approval for the trial use of unarmed drones for eastern Congo. It's also given peacekeepers an unprecedented offensive mandate to attack rebels.
Nesirky said deployment of the medium-altitude, medium-endurance drone is planned in the coming weeks.

He said it will allow U.N. peacekeepers, especially in eastern Congo, "to monitor the movements of armed groups and protect the civilian population more efficiently."


Peacekeepers in eastern Congo allowed to select surveillance drones for trial


Peacekeepers in eastern Congo allowed to select surveillance drones for trial

The United Nations has selected its first unarmed surveillance drone, an Italian-made plane that will be tried out by peacekeepers in eastern Congo.

Drone

U.N. spokesman Martin Nesirky said Thursday the world body's peacekeeping department chose an unmanned aerial vehicle produced by SELES ES, known as the Falco, which is "capable of carrying a range of payloads including several types of high-resolution sensors."

In January, the U.N. Security Council gave approval for the trial use of unarmed drones for eastern Congo. It's also given peacekeepers an unprecedented offensive mandate to attack rebels.
Nesirky said deployment of the medium-altitude, medium-endurance drone is planned in the coming weeks.

He said it will allow U.N. peacekeepers, especially in eastern Congo, "to monitor the movements of armed groups and protect the civilian population more efficiently."


Rwanda: l’avocat de Victoire Ingabire met en cause la crédibilité d’un témoin à charge


RWANDA - 
Article publié le : jeudi 01 août 2013 à 10:13 - Dernière modification le : jeudi 01 août 2013 à 10:14

Rwanda: l'avocat de Victoire Ingabire met en cause la crédibilité d'un témoin à charge

Victoire Ingabire (d.) et son avocat britannique, Ian Edwards, à l'ouverture de son procès à Kigali, le 5 septembre 2011.
Victoire Ingabire (d.) et son avocat britannique, Ian Edwards, à l'ouverture de son procès à Kigali, le 5 septembre 2011.
AFP PHOTO/Steve Terrill

Par RFI
Le procès en appel de l'opposante rwandaise Victoire Ingabire, s'est achevé mercredi 31 juillet à la Cour suprême de Kigali avec les plaidoiries de la défense. La présidente des Forces démocratiques unifiées (FDU), formation non reconnue par Kigali, avait été condamnée en première instance à 8 ans de prison ferme pour « conspiration » et « minimisation » du génocide des Tutsi de 1994. Le parquet avait requis 25 ans de prison ferme. Le verdict est attendu pour le 1er novembre 2013.

C'est l'air serein et sourire aux lèvres que Victoire Ingabire a franchi le seuil de la salle d'audience, mercredi 31 juillet, lors du dernier jour de son procès en appel. Un groupe de sespartisans, un peu plus nombreux que d'habitude, mais toujours aussi discrets, l'attendaient devant le bâtiment de la Cour suprême de Kigali.
Pour la dernière ligne droite de ce procès-fleuve, c'est Me Edwards, l'avocat britannique de Victoire Ingabire, qui a pu résumer et préciser tous les arguments visant à prouver que sa cliente avait été injustement condamnée et que la Cour devait abandonner toute les charges qui pèsent contre elle.
La défense dénonce un complot
Pendant près de trois heures, il a par exemple défendu la validité du seul et unique témoin à décharge de ce procès : une femme qui a témoigné anonymement et a assuré avoir surpris une conversation entre l'un des coaccusés de Victoire Ingabire - et témoin à charge majeur - et trois hommes qui lui aurait demandé de témoigner contre elle en disant qu'elle collaborait avec les Forces démocratiques de libération du Rwanda (FDLR). Un témoignage qui, selon la défense, étaye la thèse du complot.
Liberté d'expression
Me Edwards a également, à la fin de son plaidoyer, affirmé que les accusations de « minimisation » du génocide des Tutsi qui pèsent à l'encontre de sa cliente étaient infondées. Il en a appelé au simple respect de sa liberté d'expression.
Les traits quelque peu tirés à la fin de l'audience Me Edwards s'est néanmoins montré satisfait : « Je pense que les juges nous ont écoutés. Nous avons confiance en nos conclusions en nos arguments, mais ce n'est pas tout à fait facile de prévoir ce qu'il va se passer. Maintenant, l'affaire est dans les mains des juges. La seule chose à faire, c'est d'attendre le jugement. » Jugement attendu le 1er novembre prochain. 
TAGS: PAUL KAGAME - RWANDA
FICHE PAYS :

-“The root cause of the Rwandan tragedy of 1994 is the long and past historical ethnic dominance of one minority ethnic group to the other majority ethnic group. Ignoring this reality is giving a black cheque for the Rwandan people’s future and deepening resentment, hostility and hatred between the two groups.”

-« Ce dont j’ai le plus peur, c’est des gens qui croient que, du jour au lendemain, on peut prendre une société, lui tordre le cou et en faire une autre ».

-“The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.”

-“I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.

-“The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.”

READ MORE RECENT NEWS AND OPINIONS

Popular Posts

WebMD Health Channel - Sex & Relationships

Love Lectures

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

David DeAngelo - Dating Questions For Men

Christian Carter - Dating Questions For Women

Women - The Huffington Post

Recent Articles About Effective Communication Skills and Self Development