Pages

Wednesday, 5 June 2013

What is happening to Rwandan refugees in Uganda? - Le Monde diplomatique - English edition


BLOG POSTS

What is happening to Rwandan refugees in Uganda?

EXCLUSIVE 5 JUNE, by Judi Rever

Attacks are fuelling anxiety ahead of a global edict for Rwandan refugees to return home.

In the months leading up to his murder, Rwandan journalist Charles Ingabire lived in a state of constant fear. The outspoken critic of Rwanda fled to neighboring Uganda in 2007 but remained a target of death threats because of his dissident views. "He'd received so many warnings to stop writing about the Rwandan government," said Godwin Agaba, a Rwandan journalist who had dinner with Ingabire the night he was killed. "He really feared for his life," said Agaba, who was forced to flee Uganda immediately after the assassination of his friend.

In September 2011, unidentified assailants beat Ingabire, stole his computer and warned him to shut down his online website, Inyenyeri News, which fiercely criticized President Paul Kagame's regime. But the 32-year-old journalist didn't listen; he continued to work.

On November 30, at a bar in the Kampala suburb of Bukesa, Ingabire was shot twice in the chest. Police discovered five casings of a submachine gun at the scene.

Less than four weeks later, Jerome Ndagijimana, a member of the opposition United Democratic Forces of Rwanda who had just been granted refugee status, was found in a pool of blood, his throat slit, at a store he worked at in Kampala. In his claim for political asylum, Ndagijimana, a Tutsi, said he'd survived previous assassination attempts in his homeland for refusing to cooperate with Rwandan officials attempting to falsely incriminate innocent Hutus in Kacyiru, where he was district counselor.

Ugandan officials announced investigations into both killings, but so far no one has been charged and the murderers remain at large. Such brazen attacks came as no surprise to Rwandans in exile, but provided chilling reminders that Uganda is hardly a safe perch from which to criticize the Rwandan government or defend the rights of refugees.

In fact, since the 1994 genocide, Uganda has given Rwanda free reign to track down, abduct and execute Rwandan political opponents, both Hutu and Tutsi, often with the collaboration of Ugandan police and military, according to refugee advocates and observers.

Although relations between the two countries turned sour from 1999 until 2006, Rwandan intelligence continued to harass refugees in Uganda. Amid renewed ties, threats against Rwandans in exile have reached a new scale. "Diplomatic relations between Uganda and Rwanda improved in the past two years and this has been problematic for Rwandans fleeing their country of origin because Kampala is now replete with Rwandan security agents," said Tom Rhodes, East Africa consultant for the Committee to Protect Journalists.

The latest reported victim of Rwanda's reach is Oliver Sebakara, a 34-year-old Hutu and university graduate who fled the country in 2005 and went to live in the sprawling refugee settlement in Nakivale, some 200 kilometres southwest of Kampala. In interviews with this journalist, three separate witnesses said on March 16, Sebakara was beaten with electric batons at a bar in Mbarara, some 30 kilometres from Nakivale, where he was drinking with friends. The attackers, dressed in plain clothes, were armed with pistols and warned Sebakara's friends and wife not to intervene.  The victim was then put into a vehicle that headed to Kampala. His wife hasn't seen him since. His wife said Sebakara had previously worked in intelligence for the Rwandan government, and "was being followed by officials of that government." She added: "This is about Rwandan politics."

The United Nations refugee agency, UNHCR, said police were looking into the reported abduction. "What I am able to confirm from our own follow-up is that the police in Mbarara have affirmed the reporting of an abduction of Oliver Sebakara by his wife. An investigation by the local police is underway and a file has been opened," said the UNHCR's external relations officer, Lucy Claire Beck.

Meanwhile, a prominent refugee activist who recently fled Nakivale for the United States said he believed Sebakara was "a Rwandan target because he was active in defending refugee rights."

Manzi Mutuyimana, who has fended off several assassination attempts by Kigali, has long been persecuted for speaking out against the Rwandan regime. In July 1994, Kagame's Rwandan Patriotic Army murdered 18 of Manzi's family members at the Karubanda School for Social Workers in Butare, according to Human Rights Watch. Among the victims executed were Manzi's 79-year-old grandfather and his baby cousin, who was 17 months old.

Manzi said more recently he and Sebakara worked together in Uganda trying to mobilize refugees against a controversial measure known as the cessation clause, which is due to take effect on June 30 and will likely force thousands of Rwandan refugees who fled their country between 1959 and 1998 to return home.

United Nations offices in Africa have endorsed the clause on the grounds that Rwanda has demonstrated measurable political and economic stability since the genocide. But the UN's Geneva office has patently rejected the idea of handing over Rwandan refugees in Europe to an oppressive state. Canada and the United States have not formally announced their respective policies on the matter.

The governments of Uganda, Zambia and Tanzania are eager to get rid of Rwandans they host. Uganda — which is home to at least 16,500 Rwandan refugees and another 11,500 Rwandan asylum seekers, the vast majority of them ethnic Hutus — has already attempted to repatriate many, but the hundreds who did go home returned immediately with graphic accounts of their experiences.

Amid the spectre of a violent return to Rwanda, refugee leaders have argued that repatriation should be strictly voluntary because most refugees have well founded fears of being persecuted back home.

The latest abduction of a refugee in southwestern Uganda is merely one in a spree of menacing incidents that should be a warning to policy makers who fawn over the economic progress in post-genocide Rwanda and believe that Hutus would be better off in their homeland instead of languishing in camps. It also throws into stark relief the extent to which the United Nations, at the behest of Kigali, has poorly calculated the consequences of turning refugees over to a country in which fundamental freedoms are at risk, restoration of land and property rights is unlikely, and access to free and fair trials is virtually impossible.

Morover, refugee advocates say Sebakara's fate highlights the disturbing use of Ugandan territory as a deadly playground for Kagame's Rwandan Patriotic Front. "The context (for his disappearance) is the fact that Kagame used to be head of Uganda's security. Tutsis who were refugees in Uganda can enter and exit and run around Uganda as though they're Ugandans," said Barbara Harrell-Bond, a refugee advocate and founder of the Refugees Studies Centre at Oxford University. "So there is a constant threat of abduction and killing of Hutu refugees in Uganda. I constantly get emails from Rwandans who are hiding in some village. It's ubiquitous," she said, pointing out that Tutsis such as Ingabire who have fallen out with Kagame are also at risk.

"Of course the Ugandan police and Ugandan security are often cooperative, like individuals who are old friends," said Harrell-Bond, who has done extensive research in Uganda and is co-director of Fahamu Refugee Programme, which provides information to those who provide legal aid to refugees.

Harrell-Bond and her colleagues have gone head-to-head with Ugandan authorities over their treatment of refugees and asylum seekers.

Uganda categorically dismisses charges of such complicity and maintains that Rwandan refugees are not under threat on its territory. "These are lies," said Douglas Asiimwe, a senior protection office who works for Uganda's Office of the Prime Minister's Directorate of Refugees and Disaster Management, when questioned about abductions, disappearances and assassinations. "There was the case of Ingabire, but I've not heard of any other case," he insisted. Asiimwe said he not aware of the latest abduction in Mbarara and doubted whether the witnesses' accounts were even true. "No refugee has disappeared as far as I know," he said.  "I was (recently) in Mbarara. I was in the camps. I hadn't heard anywhere, there or at the police station, that anyone had disappeared."

But Asiimwe's quick assertion that refugees are safe in Uganda belies the reality on the ground, according to a series of emails sent by refugee leaders to Ugandan officials and UNHCR staff.

Emails exchanged show refugee leaders and advocates repeatedly requesting protection for Rwandans threatened by suspected security agents. Among the cases brought to the attention of authorities were a number of arrests and disappearances, including the murders of Godroi Ndayambaje in July 2009, of Jean-Marie Hategekimana in February 2010 and of Joseph Karushya, a refugee who was abducted in July 2010 and later found dead in the Nile River.

Despite a temporary fallout over lucrative resources in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Uganda and Rwanda have restored bilateral, brotherly ties. But the cozy relationship has imperiled Rwandan refugees seeking protection. On July 14, 2010, Ugandan police entered Nakivale and Kyaka refugee settlements, luring 1,700 refugees and asylum seekers with promises of food. With the help of the Rwandan military, they surrounded the refugees and forced them onto trucks heading to Rwanda. The UNHCR, the media and human rights organizations reported that two refugees jumped to their deaths, 25 people were injured and many children were separated from their parents.

The refugees did their own investigation into the incident and found that 14 people died in the operation, one of whom was strangled, three who were shot dead by police, two who were trampled, three who died of beatings, three who jumped off the truck, along with one woman who was 'disenwombed' and a man whose genitals were amputated by barbed wire. The refugees published the names of the victims and said their burial places could be accounted for.

Incredibly, when pressed about this incident, Uganda's Commissioner for Refugees David Kazungu denied that refugees were forcefully returned. "That is utter rubbish and false. It is not true. Nobody died and nobody was forcefully returned," Kazungu insisted.

"And as of today, not even the UNHCR has come to give us information indicating that people have been abducted," Kazungu said. "There are no abductions or disappearances of refugees. The isolated cases that appear, we handle them accordingly."

Meanwhile, the UNHCR expressed confidence in Uganda's ability to protect refugees on its territory, while admitting that 'some high profile Rwandans' had problems. "We have a few individuals who have individual concerns," said Esther Kiragu, the UNHCR's senior protection officer in Kampala. "But generally for most Rwandans, Uganda is really not an unsafe place. The government of Uganda does take its responsibility of protecting people seriously," she added.

Kiragu said since she arrived in Uganda early 2012, she hasn't heard of any cases of coercion against refugees returning to Rwanda, and expected any future repatriation to proceed without violence. "You always have to be on guard but I don't foresee any force being used at all," she said.

She also emphasized that UN staff handling reintegration of returnees in Rwanda had informed her that conditions were safe. "This is what our office there that deals with reintegration tells us. And we have no reason not to believe them."

While the United Nations stands by its claim that Rwanda is a safe country for refugees who fled before 1998, some would disagree. "Rwandans who died in waves of RPF violence from 1990 onward weren't just community leaders; the majority of them were simple peasants," Eugene Ndahayo, a member of the opposition United Democratic Forces. "Because Rwanda is a dictatorship, nobody can move. So in absolute terms, in the eyes of the international community, there is political stability. But that's because everyone has shut up and can't do anything. That's why Rwanda gives off the image of being politically stable," Ndahayo said from his base in France. "There's no political instability in North Korea either."

Perhaps most striking is the overwhelming opposition among refugees to the cessation clause, despite the security problems they already face in Uganda. Refugee advocates say that more than 90 percent of refugees who have been briefed on the matter do not want to return home.

And some, if not many, are caught on a perilous journey between two dangers.

A refugee whose wife and children were killed in June 1994 by RPA soldiers in the eastern Rwandan prefecture of Kibungo tried to reclaim his home in the aftermath of the genocide but said he received death threats. In 2006 he fled to Uganda. The refugee in question also lost a brother in 2010 in joint attempts in Nakivale to violently force Rwandans onto trucks, and became a new target when he demanded answers as to why his brother died. "I am very afraid. I cannot repatriate to Rwanda because I am not safe there," said the refugee. "But I am not safe in Uganda either. I need to go to another country or else I will die."

What is happening to Rwandan refugees in Uganda? - Le Monde diplomatique - English edition


BLOG POSTS

What is happening to Rwandan refugees in Uganda?

EXCLUSIVE 5 JUNE, by Judi Rever

Attacks are fuelling anxiety ahead of a global edict for Rwandan refugees to return home.

In the months leading up to his murder, Rwandan journalist Charles Ingabire lived in a state of constant fear. The outspoken critic of Rwanda fled to neighboring Uganda in 2007 but remained a target of death threats because of his dissident views. "He'd received so many warnings to stop writing about the Rwandan government," said Godwin Agaba, a Rwandan journalist who had dinner with Ingabire the night he was killed. "He really feared for his life," said Agaba, who was forced to flee Uganda immediately after the assassination of his friend.

In September 2011, unidentified assailants beat Ingabire, stole his computer and warned him to shut down his online website, Inyenyeri News, which fiercely criticized President Paul Kagame's regime. But the 32-year-old journalist didn't listen; he continued to work.

On November 30, at a bar in the Kampala suburb of Bukesa, Ingabire was shot twice in the chest. Police discovered five casings of a submachine gun at the scene.

Less than four weeks later, Jerome Ndagijimana, a member of the opposition United Democratic Forces of Rwanda who had just been granted refugee status, was found in a pool of blood, his throat slit, at a store he worked at in Kampala. In his claim for political asylum, Ndagijimana, a Tutsi, said he'd survived previous assassination attempts in his homeland for refusing to cooperate with Rwandan officials attempting to falsely incriminate innocent Hutus in Kacyiru, where he was district counselor.

Ugandan officials announced investigations into both killings, but so far no one has been charged and the murderers remain at large. Such brazen attacks came as no surprise to Rwandans in exile, but provided chilling reminders that Uganda is hardly a safe perch from which to criticize the Rwandan government or defend the rights of refugees.

In fact, since the 1994 genocide, Uganda has given Rwanda free reign to track down, abduct and execute Rwandan political opponents, both Hutu and Tutsi, often with the collaboration of Ugandan police and military, according to refugee advocates and observers.

Although relations between the two countries turned sour from 1999 until 2006, Rwandan intelligence continued to harass refugees in Uganda. Amid renewed ties, threats against Rwandans in exile have reached a new scale. "Diplomatic relations between Uganda and Rwanda improved in the past two years and this has been problematic for Rwandans fleeing their country of origin because Kampala is now replete with Rwandan security agents," said Tom Rhodes, East Africa consultant for the Committee to Protect Journalists.

The latest reported victim of Rwanda's reach is Oliver Sebakara, a 34-year-old Hutu and university graduate who fled the country in 2005 and went to live in the sprawling refugee settlement in Nakivale, some 200 kilometres southwest of Kampala. In interviews with this journalist, three separate witnesses said on March 16, Sebakara was beaten with electric batons at a bar in Mbarara, some 30 kilometres from Nakivale, where he was drinking with friends. The attackers, dressed in plain clothes, were armed with pistols and warned Sebakara's friends and wife not to intervene.  The victim was then put into a vehicle that headed to Kampala. His wife hasn't seen him since. His wife said Sebakara had previously worked in intelligence for the Rwandan government, and "was being followed by officials of that government." She added: "This is about Rwandan politics."

The United Nations refugee agency, UNHCR, said police were looking into the reported abduction. "What I am able to confirm from our own follow-up is that the police in Mbarara have affirmed the reporting of an abduction of Oliver Sebakara by his wife. An investigation by the local police is underway and a file has been opened," said the UNHCR's external relations officer, Lucy Claire Beck.

Meanwhile, a prominent refugee activist who recently fled Nakivale for the United States said he believed Sebakara was "a Rwandan target because he was active in defending refugee rights."

Manzi Mutuyimana, who has fended off several assassination attempts by Kigali, has long been persecuted for speaking out against the Rwandan regime. In July 1994, Kagame's Rwandan Patriotic Army murdered 18 of Manzi's family members at the Karubanda School for Social Workers in Butare, according to Human Rights Watch. Among the victims executed were Manzi's 79-year-old grandfather and his baby cousin, who was 17 months old.

Manzi said more recently he and Sebakara worked together in Uganda trying to mobilize refugees against a controversial measure known as the cessation clause, which is due to take effect on June 30 and will likely force thousands of Rwandan refugees who fled their country between 1959 and 1998 to return home.

United Nations offices in Africa have endorsed the clause on the grounds that Rwanda has demonstrated measurable political and economic stability since the genocide. But the UN's Geneva office has patently rejected the idea of handing over Rwandan refugees in Europe to an oppressive state. Canada and the United States have not formally announced their respective policies on the matter.

The governments of Uganda, Zambia and Tanzania are eager to get rid of Rwandans they host. Uganda — which is home to at least 16,500 Rwandan refugees and another 11,500 Rwandan asylum seekers, the vast majority of them ethnic Hutus — has already attempted to repatriate many, but the hundreds who did go home returned immediately with graphic accounts of their experiences.

Amid the spectre of a violent return to Rwanda, refugee leaders have argued that repatriation should be strictly voluntary because most refugees have well founded fears of being persecuted back home.

The latest abduction of a refugee in southwestern Uganda is merely one in a spree of menacing incidents that should be a warning to policy makers who fawn over the economic progress in post-genocide Rwanda and believe that Hutus would be better off in their homeland instead of languishing in camps. It also throws into stark relief the extent to which the United Nations, at the behest of Kigali, has poorly calculated the consequences of turning refugees over to a country in which fundamental freedoms are at risk, restoration of land and property rights is unlikely, and access to free and fair trials is virtually impossible.

Morover, refugee advocates say Sebakara's fate highlights the disturbing use of Ugandan territory as a deadly playground for Kagame's Rwandan Patriotic Front. "The context (for his disappearance) is the fact that Kagame used to be head of Uganda's security. Tutsis who were refugees in Uganda can enter and exit and run around Uganda as though they're Ugandans," said Barbara Harrell-Bond, a refugee advocate and founder of the Refugees Studies Centre at Oxford University. "So there is a constant threat of abduction and killing of Hutu refugees in Uganda. I constantly get emails from Rwandans who are hiding in some village. It's ubiquitous," she said, pointing out that Tutsis such as Ingabire who have fallen out with Kagame are also at risk.

"Of course the Ugandan police and Ugandan security are often cooperative, like individuals who are old friends," said Harrell-Bond, who has done extensive research in Uganda and is co-director of Fahamu Refugee Programme, which provides information to those who provide legal aid to refugees.

Harrell-Bond and her colleagues have gone head-to-head with Ugandan authorities over their treatment of refugees and asylum seekers.

Uganda categorically dismisses charges of such complicity and maintains that Rwandan refugees are not under threat on its territory. "These are lies," said Douglas Asiimwe, a senior protection office who works for Uganda's Office of the Prime Minister's Directorate of Refugees and Disaster Management, when questioned about abductions, disappearances and assassinations. "There was the case of Ingabire, but I've not heard of any other case," he insisted. Asiimwe said he not aware of the latest abduction in Mbarara and doubted whether the witnesses' accounts were even true. "No refugee has disappeared as far as I know," he said.  "I was (recently) in Mbarara. I was in the camps. I hadn't heard anywhere, there or at the police station, that anyone had disappeared."

But Asiimwe's quick assertion that refugees are safe in Uganda belies the reality on the ground, according to a series of emails sent by refugee leaders to Ugandan officials and UNHCR staff.

Emails exchanged show refugee leaders and advocates repeatedly requesting protection for Rwandans threatened by suspected security agents. Among the cases brought to the attention of authorities were a number of arrests and disappearances, including the murders of Godroi Ndayambaje in July 2009, of Jean-Marie Hategekimana in February 2010 and of Joseph Karushya, a refugee who was abducted in July 2010 and later found dead in the Nile River.

Despite a temporary fallout over lucrative resources in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Uganda and Rwanda have restored bilateral, brotherly ties. But the cozy relationship has imperiled Rwandan refugees seeking protection. On July 14, 2010, Ugandan police entered Nakivale and Kyaka refugee settlements, luring 1,700 refugees and asylum seekers with promises of food. With the help of the Rwandan military, they surrounded the refugees and forced them onto trucks heading to Rwanda. The UNHCR, the media and human rights organizations reported that two refugees jumped to their deaths, 25 people were injured and many children were separated from their parents.

The refugees did their own investigation into the incident and found that 14 people died in the operation, one of whom was strangled, three who were shot dead by police, two who were trampled, three who died of beatings, three who jumped off the truck, along with one woman who was 'disenwombed' and a man whose genitals were amputated by barbed wire. The refugees published the names of the victims and said their burial places could be accounted for.

Incredibly, when pressed about this incident, Uganda's Commissioner for Refugees David Kazungu denied that refugees were forcefully returned. "That is utter rubbish and false. It is not true. Nobody died and nobody was forcefully returned," Kazungu insisted.

"And as of today, not even the UNHCR has come to give us information indicating that people have been abducted," Kazungu said. "There are no abductions or disappearances of refugees. The isolated cases that appear, we handle them accordingly."

Meanwhile, the UNHCR expressed confidence in Uganda's ability to protect refugees on its territory, while admitting that 'some high profile Rwandans' had problems. "We have a few individuals who have individual concerns," said Esther Kiragu, the UNHCR's senior protection officer in Kampala. "But generally for most Rwandans, Uganda is really not an unsafe place. The government of Uganda does take its responsibility of protecting people seriously," she added.

Kiragu said since she arrived in Uganda early 2012, she hasn't heard of any cases of coercion against refugees returning to Rwanda, and expected any future repatriation to proceed without violence. "You always have to be on guard but I don't foresee any force being used at all," she said.

She also emphasized that UN staff handling reintegration of returnees in Rwanda had informed her that conditions were safe. "This is what our office there that deals with reintegration tells us. And we have no reason not to believe them."

While the United Nations stands by its claim that Rwanda is a safe country for refugees who fled before 1998, some would disagree. "Rwandans who died in waves of RPF violence from 1990 onward weren't just community leaders; the majority of them were simple peasants," Eugene Ndahayo, a member of the opposition United Democratic Forces. "Because Rwanda is a dictatorship, nobody can move. So in absolute terms, in the eyes of the international community, there is political stability. But that's because everyone has shut up and can't do anything. That's why Rwanda gives off the image of being politically stable," Ndahayo said from his base in France. "There's no political instability in North Korea either."

Perhaps most striking is the overwhelming opposition among refugees to the cessation clause, despite the security problems they already face in Uganda. Refugee advocates say that more than 90 percent of refugees who have been briefed on the matter do not want to return home.

And some, if not many, are caught on a perilous journey between two dangers.

A refugee whose wife and children were killed in June 1994 by RPA soldiers in the eastern Rwandan prefecture of Kibungo tried to reclaim his home in the aftermath of the genocide but said he received death threats. In 2006 he fled to Uganda. The refugee in question also lost a brother in 2010 in joint attempts in Nakivale to violently force Rwandans onto trucks, and became a new target when he demanded answers as to why his brother died. "I am very afraid. I cannot repatriate to Rwanda because I am not safe there," said the refugee. "But I am not safe in Uganda either. I need to go to another country or else I will die."

La tête des terroristes d'Afrique de l'Ouest mise à prix par les Etats-Unis | Slate Afrique

mis à jour le 

L'Algérien Mokhtar Belmokhtar / AFP
L'Algérien Mokhtar Belmokhtar / AFP

La tête des terroristes d'Afrique de l'Ouest mise à prix par les Etats-Unis

C'est une première depuis le lancement, en 1984, du programme «Récompense pour la justice». Le pactole est de 23 millions de dollars.


Washington offre depuis lundi jusqu'à 23 millions de dollars de récompense pour toute information conduisant notamment à la capture du djihadiste Mokhtar Belmokhtar, celle du chef de la secte islamiste nigériane Boko Haram, ou des responsables d'Aqmi, une première contre des terroristes d'Afrique de l'Ouest.

D'autres responsables du groupe Al-Qaïda au Maghreb islamique (Aqmi) sont également visés par ce programme du département d'Etat, baptisé«récompenses pour la justice», qui offre depuis 1984 des sommes d'argent à tout informateur permettant l'arrestation ou l'élimination d'individus qui menacent les intérêts des Etats-Unis.

La plus grosse récompense, sept millions de dollars, est réservée au n°1 présumé de Boko Haram, Abubakar Shekau, qui combat actuellement l'armée du Nigeria dans le nord-est du pays.

Une manne de cinq millions de dollars est également offerte à quiconque apportera des renseignements décisifs concernant l'Algérien Belmokhtar, un ancien chef d'Aqmi qui a monté son propre groupe fin 2012. Donné pour mort par le Tchad en avril, il a menacé il y a dix jours de lancer de nouvelles attaques au Niger après les attentats suicide de la fin mai. Son groupe avait mené une énorme prise d'otages en janvier dans un complexe gazier en Algérie.

Cinq millions de dollars sont également promis pour la tête de Yahya Abou Al-Hammam, un dirigeant algérien d'Aqmi accusé d'être impliqué dans le meurtre d'un otage français en 2010.

Malik Abou Abdelkarim, commandant d'Aqmi, et Oumar Ould Hamahathe porte-parole du Mouvement pour l'unicité et le jihad en Afrique de l'Ouest (Mujao), un groupe islamiste chassé du Mali en janvier, sont également la cible de Washington, avec trois millions chacun de récompenses.

«Aqmi est de plus en actif dans le Nord et l'Ouest de l'Afrique. Ils font partie des tout premiers groupes qui kidnappent contre rançons dans la nébuleuse terroriste mondiale», a dit à l'AFP un responsable du département d'Etat.

«Ils représentent pour nous une grande source d'inquiétudes. Tout ce que nous pouvons faire pour réduire les capacités d'Aqmi, pour obtenir des informations sur ces individus et les traduire en justice, c'est notre objectif», a expliqué ce diplomate américain, sous couvert de l'anonymat.

Les Etats-Unis s'alarment depuis des mois de la puissance des groupes islamistes armés dans le Sahel et en Afrique de l'Ouest, notamment d'Aqmi et de Boko Haram. Washington a applaudi et appuyé l'opération militaire française au Mali.

La campagne du département d'Etat lancée lundi se fera notamment via des affiches placardées au Mali, au Nigeria et dans les pays voisins, plaçant sur le même poster des photos de dirigeants d'Aqmi et de Boko Haram.

«Ils entretiennent des relations depuis un moment, notamment avec des entraînements et des caches d'armes communes», selon le responsable du ministère.

AFP

Tuesday, 4 June 2013

Guerre aux Kivu : La Tanzanie ne présentera jamais des excuses au Rwanda | Africatime


Guerre aux Kivu : La Tanzanie ne présentera jamais des excuses au Rwanda
(KongoTimes 06/04/2013 - 16:52)

Après la proposition objective du Président tanzanien Jakaya Kikwete sur la crise dans les Grands lacs où il demandait à Paul Kagame de dialoguer avec ses ennemis des FDLR, le Président rwandais était fou furieux. Il a considéré cette allusion à une négociation avec les FDLR comme un crime de la part de son homologue tanzanien à qui il a demandé de présenter des excuses sans autre forme de procès.

La Tanzanie vient de répondre par la bouche de son ministre des Affaires étrangères Bernard Membe. Ce dernier est formel et catégorique. Le Président Kikwete ne présentera jamais des excuses au Rwanda. Jakaya Kikwete a donc bien réservé une fin de non-recevoir à la demande loufoque de Paul Kagame. Et pour cause. Kikwete estime qu'il n'a dit que la vérité. Rien que la vérité. Pourquoi alors s'en faire ? Pour lui, sa déclaration était basée sur des faits réels. Sur cette base, il demande au Rwanda d'accepter sa proposition en la considérant comme un conseil qui lui est donné.

La question qui vient à l'esprit est de savoir pourquoi il n'y a que le Président rwandais qui a réagi avec autant de violence envoyant même sa ministre des Affaires étrangères qualifier les propos du Président Kikwete d'aberrants?

Pourtant Kikwete est un Président démocratiquement élu. Ce qui n'est, de toute évidence, pas le cas de Paul Kagame. Le Rwanda a tout à apprendre de la Tanzanie de Jakaya Kikwete qui, dans la sous-région des Grands lacs, est un modèle de démocratie. Une référence démocratique de laquelle le Rwanda est situé à des années-lumière. Ceux qui suivent de près l'actualité de la crise dans les Grands lacs savent eux que la colère de Kagame vient du fait qu'avec la proposition de Kikwete, l'homme de Kigali est démasqué.

Son prétexte des FDLR tombe à l'eau aux yeux de la Communauté internationale qui se rend compte que ces FDLR ne sont pas aussi dangereuses que le présente le Rwanda. C'est depuis longtemps qu'elles avaient perdu leur capacité de nuisance. La preuve, c'est qu'on ne les a jamais entendues opérer au Rwanda même mais seulement en RDC. Raison pour laquelle Kigali ne veut rien entendre qui puisse montrer cette réalité. Concernant le M23, certains continuent naïvement à croire que ce mouvement ne bénéficie plus de l'appui du Rwanda. Faux. Le Rwanda continue à être le maître d'œuvre de tout ce qui se passe à l'est de la Rdc.

Le jour où ce pays cessera son appui, le M23 sera défait. Le mouvement pro-rwandais continue à être approvisionné en armes par Kigali. Il s'est ouvert à l'Onu hier une réunion sur le traité sur le commerce des armes. Celui-ci a atteint un chiffre d'affaires de 70 milliards Usd par an. Parmi les pays qui sont victimes de ce commerce, on a cité la Rdc avec la guerre de l'Est.

L'Ong internationale ACNA qui milite pour la signature du traité sur les armes afin d'établir une transparence de ce secteur et fixer une traçabilité dans la vente des armes a fait voir que les armes qui sont acheminées à l'Est de la Rdc sont de licence américaine, russe et chinoise. Comment ces armes parviennent-elles au M23 qui n'est pas un Etat importateur si ce n'est soit par le Rwanda ou l'Ouganda qui eux ont des licences d'importation.

En outre, le M23 est coincé sur une portion du territoire de Rutshuru totalement enclavée et bloquée entre le Rwanda et l'Ouganda. Quand le M23 envoie une lettre officielle aux armées Sud-africaine et tanzanienne pour les dissuader de venir constituer la Brigade de la Monusco en leur promettant un bain de sang, il sait de quoi il parle. Avec quel armement se préparait-il à résister à la Brigade d'intervention de la Monusco comme il l'a lui-même annoncé dans ses lettres de menaces ? Pas avec des lance-pierres.

[Kandolo M.]

RDC: la brigade d’intervention de la Monusco entame ses patrouilles à Goma | Radio Okapi


RDC: la brigade d'intervention de la Monusco entame ses patrouilles à Goma

Des militaires tanzaniens de la Brigade d'intervention de la Monusco lors de leur arrivée à Goma (Photo Clara Padovan)Des militaires tanzaniens de la Brigade d'intervention de la Monusco lors de leur arrivée à Goma (Photo Clara Padovan)
La brigade d'intervention de la Monusco chargée de combattre les groupes armés dans l'Est de la République démocratique du Congo (RDC) a commencé à patrouiller avec des effectifs réduits. Le porte-parole des Nations unies, Martin Nesirky l'a annoncé lundi 3 juin à New York.

Environ 870 soldats sur les 3 000 que doit compter la brigade se trouvent déjà à Goma, a précisé Martin Nesirky dans une dépêche de l'AFP. «La brigade a commencé à opérer à Goma, y compris en effectuant des patrouilles de jour et de nuit» avec d'autres éléments de la Monusco, selon la même source.

Le patron des opérations de maintien de la paix de l'Onu, Hervé Ladsous, avait indiqué récemment que la brigade serait pleinement opérationnelle d'ici la mi-juillet.

La création de cette unité avait été autorisée fin mars par le Conseil de sécurité pour renforcer la Monusco, la plus importante mission de l'Onu dans le monde, forte de 17.000 hommes et chargée de la protection des civils. Dotée d'un mandat offensif, elle doit combattre et désarmer les groupes rebelles dans l'Est de la RDC, dont les Forces démocratiques pour la libération du Rwanda (FDLR) et le Mouvement du 23 mars (M23).

Mais le M23 s'est toujours opposé à la création de la Brigade d'intervention de la Monusco. Pour les rebelles, en votant la résolution 2098, les Nations unies ont opté pour la guerre.

Ce mouvement rebelle se bat contre les Forces armées de la République démocratique du Congo (FARDC) depuis mai 2012 au Nord-Kivu. Les pourparlers entre le gouvernement congolais et la rébellion n'ayant toujours pas abouti, les deux groupes se sont de nouveau affrontés, mardi 21 mai dans la matinée à Mutaho dans le territoire de Nyiragongo près de Goma.  Les combats ont entraîné un déplacement de plus de cinq mille personnes.

Les premiers éléments de la brigade étaient arrivés à Goma le 13 mai. Cette unité devrait être composée de soldats tanzaniens, malawites et sud-africains.


-“The root cause of the Rwandan tragedy of 1994 is the long and past historical ethnic dominance of one minority ethnic group to the other majority ethnic group. Ignoring this reality is giving a black cheque for the Rwandan people’s future and deepening resentment, hostility and hatred between the two groups.”

-« Ce dont j’ai le plus peur, c’est des gens qui croient que, du jour au lendemain, on peut prendre une société, lui tordre le cou et en faire une autre ».

-“The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.”

-“I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.

-“The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.”

READ MORE RECENT NEWS AND OPINIONS

Popular Posts

WebMD Health Channel - Sex & Relationships

Love Lectures

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

David DeAngelo - Dating Questions For Men

Christian Carter - Dating Questions For Women

Women - The Huffington Post

Recent Articles About Effective Communication Skills and Self Development