Pages

Friday, 7 September 2012

Verdict Postponed In Rwanda Political Prisoner's Case


 
 

Verdict Postponed In Rwanda Political Prisoner's Case

By Boniface Twagirimana
09-07-12
 
 
 
Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza



 
[Op-Ed]

The High Court in Kigali has just adjourned to Friday 19 October 2012, the political verdict of the opposition leader, Madame Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza.

She has been incarcerated since 14 October 2010 on politically motivated charges. The Court is waiting for the Supreme court ruling on a constitutional review motion.

The prosecution has asked for a life sentence in this case. Most of the presidents of opposition parties in Rwanda are in maximum security prisons.

Three days ago, we were informed about the disappearance of the first vice president of PS Imberakuri, Mr. Alexis Bakunzibake. There are news that the kidnappers have dumped him alive in a bush in Kabare district in neighboring Uganda. We are still investigating this information.

We welcome the return yesterday from exile of Mr. Frank Habineza, leader of the Democratic Green Party of Rwanda. He left after the assassination of his first Vice President, the late André Kagwa Rwisereka in July 2010, a month before the presidential election.

The demanded independent investigation never happened.


Boniface Twagirimana is Interim Vice President, FDU-Inkingi
=
__._,_.___


Verdict for Rwandan opponent postponed to October 19


 
Verdict for Rwandan opponent postponed to October 19
KIGALI — A Rwandan court on Friday postponed the verdict for opposition figure Victoire Ingabire, accused of bankrolling terrorism and denying the 1994 genocide, until October 19.
The court said it would wait for the decision of a higher court on a separate suit filed by Ingabire before handing down its verdict.
"The court realised that Ingabire filed a suit in the Supreme Court challenging the genocide ideology law," judge Alice Rulisa told the court, adding that a lawyer for Ingabire had also requested the court wait for the Supreme Court ruling before handing down its own decision.
In late June the same court had already postponed the verdict once.
Ingabire, leader of the Unified Democratic Forces (FDU), a political grouping that has not been allowed to register as a party, is charged with "giving financial support to a terrorist group, planning to cause state insecurity and divisionism".
Ingabire, a Hutu, denies the charges.
Prosecutors in April called for her to be given a life sentence.
Ingabire, an outspoken critic of President Paul Kagame, has been in custody since her arrest in October 2010, and has boycotted proceedings since April after the court cut short a witness who accused Rwandan authorities of rigging evidence against her.
Rwandan prosecutors claim to have evidence of Ingabire's "terrorist" activities, including proof of financial transfers to the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Rwanda, a Hutu rebel movement based in neighbouring Democratic Republic of Congo.
The FDU accuses Rwandan authorities of fabricating evidence against its leader, with the sole aim of preventing her from participating in the political affairs of the small central African country.
Ingabire was absent as she has been boycotting the court proceedings in recent months, but her four co-accused were in court.


Opposition leader kidnapped and expelled from his native Rwanda manu militari


 

Opposition leader kidnapped and expelled from his native Rwanda manu militari

Alexis Bakunzibake – 1st Vice President – PS-Imberakuri
Ijwi Rya Rubanda, an online radio station operating from London announced today having managed to talk to Alexis Bakunzibake, 1st Vice President of the Rwandan opposition party PS-Imberakuri, from Uganda border with Rwanda, where Kagame's security forces had dumped him alive.
Times are changing for the Rwandan Patriotic Front. If we remember, a little more than 2 years ago, on July 13, 2010 André Kagwa Rwisereka, vice-president of the Democratic Green Party, was reported missing. His car was then found near the southern town of Butare.
The following day, his mutilated body is found on the outskirts of Butare. He had been also kidnapped but as well unfortunately decapitated. Of course, at the time and even until today, Kagame's government has denied any involvement in the assassination of this politician from the opposition.
Alexis Bakunzibake, whom we reported this week the kidnapping from his neighbourhood in Kigali, was apparently seriously beaten up and bear a number of scars and bruises on different parts of his body [arms and legs particularly]. That is what he communicated to Ijwi Rya Rubanda.
He indicated that on Wednesday, he had been forcibly removed from a taxi, the public around watching without any questioning thinking probably that he was another individual that Rwandan authorities were after for their own reasons. They put him in a car, blindfolded him, and drove to an unknown location. He was after taken into a room, handcuffed and leg-cuffed.
During the interrogation, he was asked why he was not working with the other faction of his party PS-Imberakuri that is affiliated to the Rwandan Patriotic Front. The source of funds they use was also part of many questions they wanted him to answer.
The following day his kidnappers drove for hours on bumpy roads, and around 2 pm, they dumped him in an inhabited area in Uganda and close to Kabare. He had to walk 12 hours night and day to reach the first residential settlements in the region.
Though he had been dispossessed of all his accessories [shoes and particularly means of communication], he had managed to hide from his kidnappers a sim card, with which he was able to talk to the outside world and tell his dramatic encounter.
On the same day we write this story, we learnt that another politician from the
Victoire Ingabire – Leader of FDU-Inkingi – Iconic figure advocating democracy and reconciliation in Rwandan recent and unfolding history
opposition, Victoire Ingabire, leader of FDU-Inkingi, who is imprisoned in Kigali since 14 October 2012, and whose sentencing was meant to be read today, has seen her hearing postponed to 19 October 2012.
The court explained that the postponement was due to the fact it needed to consider the High Court reply to the review of the law on genocide, divisionism and revisionism, since the accused has challenged the Rwandan judiciary on its unconstitutional character.
As one can rightly assess, the Rwandan opposition has still significant challenges in its way before any different society where all citizens are treated equally and fairly by their political leaders, would emerge. The important on that journey is not to give up. While hope can sustain lives of many that Kagame oppresses, signs are there to show a shift in the balance of powers.
A last word on the interpretation of expelling Alexis Bakunzibake out of Rwanda is worth considering. By taking such drastic measure towards a Rwandan citizen, does that mean the victim could not be punishable by any law of the land if he had committed some offense or crime? Or does it send a strong message to all politicians from the opposition telling them that if they want to oppose Kagame, they better be outside the country? No wonder why at some time Victoire Ingabire was too once asked if she wanted to leave Rwanda, they could help her. But they forget that they are only postponing the inevitable.
=
__._,_.___


Tuesday, 4 September 2012

Helping Africa develop growth that benefits its poor





The challenges of capital, capacity and corruption need to be confronted if real economic progress is to be made, says Mark Rowland of VSO after a week in Uganda



Africa APPG questions DFID’s choice of aid priorities




From: Africa All Party Parliamentary Group, Houses of Parliament

All Party Group of MPs and Peers question Government’s choice of countries to receive UK aid

The Africa All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG)2, a cross-party group of almost 90 MPs and Peers, questions the Government’s selection of countries to receive aid, in a report released today (Monday 2 January) entitled “DFID’s Aid Priorities and Africa”1.  The report analyses the Government’s Bilateral Aid Review (BAR) published in 2011, which led the Department for International Development (DFID) to reduce the number of countries it operates in from 43 in 2008/9 to 27 by 2016.

The  cross party group concludes that the premise that DFID should operate more effectively in fewer countries is sensible, but the lack of objective criteria, the poor quality of some of the information used to select focus countries, and the lack of transparency of the process, mean the countries selected to receive aid are not the optimum choices.  The report also discusses the implications of the BAR for how UK aid should be spent in Africa.


DFID Africa Directorate: Operational Plan 2011-2015

The UK Government is determined to help reduce the inequalities of opportunity we see around the world today. We believe that promoting global
prosperity is both a moral duty and in the UKs national interest. Aid is only ever a means to an end, never an end in itself. It is wealth creation and
sustainable growth that will help people to lift themselves out of poverty.

In May 2010, the International Development Secretary, Andrew Mitchell, commissioned the Bilateral Aid Review to take a comprehensive and
ambitious look at the countries in which DFID works through our direct country and regional programmes. The review focussed on the best ways for
the UK to tackle extreme poverty, ensuring that we make the greatest impact with every pound we spend. In parallel, through the Multilateral Aid
Review, DFID assessed how effective the international organisations we fund are at tackling poverty.

On the 1st March 2011, the key outcomes of the reviews were announced, including the results that UK aid will deliver for the world's poorest people
over the next four years. The Bilateral Aid Review has refocused the aid programme in fewer countries so that we can target our support where it will
make the biggest difference and where the need is greatest. The Multilateral Aid Review findings enable us to put more money behind effective
international organisations which are critical to delivering the UKs development priorities. In addition the independent Humanitarian Emergency
Response Review looked at how the UK can build on its strengths in responding impartially to humanitarian needs and help ensure future disaster
responses can be better prepared and coordinated.

DFID is committed to being a global leader on transparency. In the current financial climate, we have a particular duty to show that we are achieving
value for every pound of UK taxpayers money that we spend on development. Results, transparency and accountability are our watchwords and guide
everything we do. DFID regards transparency as fundamental to improving its accountability to UK citizens and to improving accountability to citizens
in the countries in which it works. Transparency will also help us achieve more value for money in the programmes we deliver and will improve the
effectiveness of aid in reducing poverty.
The UK Aid Transparency Guarantee commits DFID to making our aid fully transparent to citizens in both the UK and developing countries. As part of
this commitment we are publishing Operational Plans for country programmes. The Operational Plans set out the vision, priorities and results that will
be delivered in each of our country programmes.
We will concentrate our efforts on supporting achievement of the Millennium Development Goals, creating wealth in poor countries, strengthening their
governance and security and tackling climate change

-“The root cause of the Rwandan tragedy of 1994 is the long and past historical ethnic dominance of one minority ethnic group to the other majority ethnic group. Ignoring this reality is giving a black cheque for the Rwandan people’s future and deepening resentment, hostility and hatred between the two groups.”

-« Ce dont j’ai le plus peur, c’est des gens qui croient que, du jour au lendemain, on peut prendre une société, lui tordre le cou et en faire une autre ».

-“The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.”

-“I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.

-“The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.”

READ MORE RECENT NEWS AND OPINIONS

Popular Posts

WebMD Health Channel - Sex & Relationships

Love Lectures

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

David DeAngelo - Dating Questions For Men

Christian Carter - Dating Questions For Women

Women - The Huffington Post

Recent Articles About Effective Communication Skills and Self Development